Literature DB >> 15525745

Extended interval for retrieval of Günther Tulip filters.

Olaf Alfons Terhaar1, Stuart Macalister Lyon, Mark Frank Given, Anne Elizabeth Foster, Frank Mc Grath, Michael J Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the Gunther Tulip vena cava filter with regard to ease of placement, complications, and retrieval over long time periods.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 53 patients (ratio of men to women, 24:29; mean age, 52.8 years) retrievable Gunther Tulip filters (Vena Cava M Reye Filter Set; William Cook Europe, Denmark) were inserted. Indications included planned major surgery with recent pulmonary embolus or high pulmonary embolus risk (n = 16), extensive ilio-femoral thrombus (n = 11), deep vein thrombosis with anticoagulant complications (n = 9), breakthrough pulmonary embolus despite anticoagulant therapy (n = 4), and contraindication to anticoagulant therapy (n = 13). All patients were followed-up for immediate and long-term complications.
RESULTS: Fifty-three filters were successfully placed in 52 of 53 patients, yielding a success rate of 98.1%. Nineteen patients underwent attempted retrieval of their filter. Sixteen of 19 retrieval procedures were successful (84%). In three patients, the filter could not be removed on attempted retrieval (extensive filter thrombus in two patients and attachment to the wall in one patient). One patient received two filters, which were both successfully retrieved at a later date. Median implantation time for retrievable filters was 34 days (range, 7-126 days). Mean follow-up for patients with permanent filters was 13 months. Two major complications (pneumothorax and break through pulmonary embolus) and three minor complications (right internal jugular vein thrombosis in two patients and transient Horner's Syndrome in one patient) were recorded.
CONCLUSION: Insertion and retrieval of filters is safe and feasible. Preliminary data suggest that Gunther Tulip filter retrieval is feasible over and above the manufacturer's recommended retrieval interval of 14 days.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15525745     DOI: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000134497.50590.E2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  13 in total

Review 1.  Optional inferior vena caval filters: where are we now?

Authors:  A N Keeling; T B Kinney; M J Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Retrieval of gunther tulip vena cava filter with thrombosed hook and a leg incorporated into the vena cava wall.

Authors:  Takuji Yamagami; Rika Yoshimatsu; Tomohiro Matsumoto; Tsunehiko Nishimura
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2009-04-15

3.  Internal jugular and common femoral venous access for the removal of a long-term embedded vena cava filter.

Authors:  Umer Salati; Pradeep Govender; William Torreggiani; Ronan Browne
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 4.  Vena cava filters in spinal cord injuries: evolving technology.

Authors:  Jeffery S Johns; Conner Nguyen; Ronald F Sing
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  Prophylactic inferior vena cava filters in high-risk bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Khashayar Vaziri; J Devin Watson; Amy P Harper; Juliet Lee; Fredrick J Brody; Shawn Sarin; Elizabeth A Ignacio; Albert Chun; Anthony C Venbrux; Paul P Lin
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  The use of paired optionally retrievable günther tulip filters in trauma patients with anatomical variants.

Authors:  Nghia-Jack Vo; Karen W Wieseler; Thomas R Burdick; Gaurav K Goswami; Sandeep S Vaidya; R Torrance Andrews
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.513

7.  Rates and predictors of plans for inferior vena cava filter retrieval in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  John F Mission; Robert K Kerlan; Justin H Tan; Margaret C Fang
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Using inferior vena cava filters to prevent pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  John Chung; Richard J T Owen
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Removal of a Günther Tulip retrievable inferior vena cava filter after 147 days in a pediatric patient.

Authors:  Rekha N Mody; Leann S Stokes; Peter R Bream; Stephanie E Spottswood
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-03-11

Review 10.  Optional vena cava filters: indications, management, and results.

Authors:  Hanno Hoppe
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 5.594

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.