Literature DB >> 15521463

The evolution of gene expression in mouse hippocampus in response to selective breeding for increased locomotor activity.

A M Bronikowski1, J S Rhodes, T Garland, T A Prolla, T A Awad, S C Gammie.   

Abstract

The evolution of behavior has been notoriously difficult to study at the molecular level, but mouse genetic technology offers new promise. We applied selective breeding to increase voluntary wheel running in four replicate lines of Mus domesticus (S mice) while maintaining four additional lines through random breeding to serve as controls (C mice). The goal of the study was to identify the gene expression profile of the hippocampus that may have evolved to facilitate the increased voluntary running. The hippocampus was of interest because it is known to display marked physiological responses in association with wheel running itself. We used high-density oligonucleotide arrays representing 11,904 genes. To control for the confounding influence of physical activity itself on gene expression, animals were housed individually without access to running wheels, and were sampled during the day when they are normally inactive. Two-month-old female mice in estrus were used (n = 16 total; two per line; 8 S and 8 C). After correcting for an acceptable false discovery rate (10%), 30 genes, primarily involved in transcription and translation, significantly increased expression whereas 23 genes, distributed among many categories including immune function and neuronal signaling, decreased expression in S versus C mice. These changes were relatively small in magnitude relative to the changes in gene expression that occur in the hippocampus in response to wheel running itself. A priori tests of dopamine receptor expression levels demonstrated an increase of approximately 20% in the expression of D2 and D4 receptors. These results suggest that relatively small changes in the expression patterns of hippocampal genes underlie large changes in phenotypic response to selection, and that the genetic architecture of running motivation likely involves the dopaminergic system as well as CNS signaling machinery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15521463     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00491.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  19 in total

1.  Functional genomic architecture of predisposition to voluntary exercise in mice: expression QTL in the brain.

Authors:  Scott A Kelly; Derrick L Nehrenberg; Kunjie Hua; Theodore Garland; Daniel Pomp
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  How to run far: multiple solutions and sex-specific responses to selective breeding for high voluntary activity levels.

Authors:  Theodore Garland; Scott A Kelly; Jessica L Malisch; Erik M Kolb; Robert M Hannon; Brooke K Keeney; Shana L Van Cleave; Kevin M Middleton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Driven to be inactive? The genetics of physical activity.

Authors:  Trudy Moore-Harrison; J Timothy Lightfoot
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.622

4.  Pharmacological manipulation of the dopaminergic system affects wheel-running activity in differentially active mice.

Authors:  A M Knab; R S Bowen; A T Hamilton; J T Lightfoot
Journal:  J Biol Regul Homeost Agents       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.711

5.  Altered gene expression in mice selected for high maternal aggression.

Authors:  S C Gammie; A P Auger; H M Jessen; R J Vanzo; T A Awad; S A Stevenson
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 3.449

6.  Oxidative capacity and fatigability in run-trained malignant hyperthermia-susceptible mice.

Authors:  Clement Rouviere; Benjamin T Corona; Christopher P Ingalls
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 7.  Sex-dependent differences in voluntary physical activity.

Authors:  Cheryl S Rosenfeld
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 8.  The biological control of voluntary exercise, spontaneous physical activity and daily energy expenditure in relation to obesity: human and rodent perspectives.

Authors:  Theodore Garland; Heidi Schutz; Mark A Chappell; Brooke K Keeney; Thomas H Meek; Lynn E Copes; Wendy Acosta; Clemens Drenowatz; Robert C Maciel; Gertjan van Dijk; Catherine M Kotz; Joey C Eisenmann
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 9.  Does the difference between physically active and couch potato lie in the dopamine system?

Authors:  Amy M Knab; J Timothy Lightfoot
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 6.580

10.  Genetic Basis of Aerobically Supported Voluntary Exercise: Results from a Selection Experiment with House Mice.

Authors:  David A Hillis; Liran Yadgary; George M Weinstock; Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena; Daniel Pomp; Alexandra S Fowler; Shizhong Xu; Frank Chan; Theodore Garland
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.