Literature DB >> 15520800

GM crops: good or bad? Those who choose the questions determine the answers.

Sue Mayer1, Andy Stirling.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2004        PMID： 15520800      PMCID： PMC1299180          DOI： 10.1038/sj.embor.7400285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO Rep        ISSN： 1469-221X            Impact factor:   8.807


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

Review 1.  Public reactions and scientific responses to transgenic crops.

Authors:  P J Dale
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 9.740

Review 2.  Elements of precaution: recommendations for the regulation of food biotechnology in Canada.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2001-09

3.  Of maize and men. Is the endorsement of GM crops science or politics?

Authors:  S Flothmann; J van Aken
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  UK field-scale evaluations answer wrong questions.

Authors:  Bruce Chassy; Catherine Carter; Martina McGloughlin; Alan McHughen; Wayne Parrott; Christopher Preston; Richard Roush; Anthony Shelton; Steven H Strauss
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Sensitivity analysis for importance assessment.

Authors:  Andrea Saltelli
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  GM food and crops: what went wrong in the UK? Many of the public's concerns have little to do with science.

Authors:  Derek Burke
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 8.807

7.  Assessment of allergenic potential of genetically modified foods: an agenda for future research.

Authors:  MaryJane K Selgrade; Ian Kimber; Lynn Goldman; Dori R Germolec
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.031
  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Society and GMOs--chicken and egg? The lessons from the GM crops debate in Europe over risk management and communication provide valuable pointers for the upcoming debate on GM animals.

Authors:  Núria Vàzquez-Salat; Louis-Marie Houdebine
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Towards a more open debate about values in decision-making on agricultural biotechnology.

Authors:  Yann Devos; Olivier Sanvido; Joyce Tait; Alan Raybould
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  Multicriteria mapping of stakeholder preferences in regulating nanotechnology.

Authors:  Steffen Foss Hansen
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 2.253

4.  Opening up the politics of knowledge and power in bioscience.

Authors:  Andy Stirling
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  Exploring public discourses about emerging technologies through statistical clustering of open-ended survey questions.

Authors:  Paul Stoneman; Patrick Sturgis; Nick Allum
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2012-04-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.