Literature DB >> 15520688

Postpubertal assessment of treatment timing for maxillary expansion and protraction therapy followed by fixed appliances.

Lorenzo Franchi1, Tiziano Baccetti, James A McNamara.   

Abstract

In this cephalometric investigation, we evaluated the correction of Class III malocclusion in subjects who had attained postpubertal skeletal maturity and considered whether treatment timing influenced favorable craniofacial modifications. All subjects (n = 50) were treated with an initial phase of rapid maxillary expansion and protraction facemask therapy, followed by a second phase of preadjusted edgewise therapy. The treated sample was divided into an early treated group (early mixed or late deciduous dentition, 33 subjects) and a late treated group (late mixed dentition, 17 subjects). Mean treatment duration times were 7 years 2 months for the early treatment group and 4 years 5 months for the late treatment group. The treated patients were matched to untreated controls (early control group, 14 subjects; late control group, 10 subjects) on the basis of race, sex, mean age at first observation, mean age at second observation, mean observation intervals, and type of malocclusion. A modified version of Johnston's pitchfork analysis, with additional angular and linear measures for mandibular size and shape and for vertical skeletal relationships, was performed. Analysis of variance was used to evaluate the difference in means for each cephalometric variable in the treated groups compared with the corresponding control groups. The findings showed that orthopedic treatment of Class III malocclusion was more effective when it was initiated at an early developmental phase of the dentition (early mixed or late deciduous) rather than during later stages with respect to untreated Class III control groups. Patients treated with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy in the late mixed dentition, however, still benefited from the treatment, but to a lesser degree. Early treatment produced significant favorable postpubertal modifications in both maxillary and mandibular structures, whereas late treatment induced only a significant restriction of mandibular growth. Significant changes in mandibular size were associated with significant changes in mandibular shape only in early treated subjects. The main contribution to overall occlusal correction was related to skeletal modifications rather than dental changes in both early and late treated groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15520688     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.10.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  40 in total

1.  Three-dimensional densitometric analysis of maxillary sutural changes induced by rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  R Lione; L Franchi; E Fanucci; G Laganà; P Cozza
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Zygomaticomaxillary suture maturation: Part II-The influence of sutural maturation on the response to maxillary protraction.

Authors:  F Angelieri; A C Ruellas; M S Yatabe; L H S Cevidanes; L Franchi; C Toyama-Hino; H J De Clerck; T Nguyen; J A McNamara
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  The cervical vertebral maturation method: A user's guide.

Authors:  James A McNamara; Lorenzo Franchi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Zygomaticomaxillary suture maturation: A predictor of maxillary protraction? Part I - A classification method.

Authors:  F Angelieri; L Franchi; L H S Cevidanes; C T Hino; T Nguyen; J A McNamara
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Comparison of short-term effects between face mask and skeletal anchorage therapy with intermaxillary elastics in patients with maxillary retrognathia.

Authors:  Cahide Ağlarcı; Elçin Esenlik; Yavuz Fındık
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Elimination of hand-wrist radiographs for maturity assessment in children needing orthodontic therapy.

Authors:  Hessa A Al Khal; Ricky W K Wong; A Bakr M Rabie
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary changes associated with facemask and rapid maxillary expansion compared with bone anchored maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Claudia Toyama Hino; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Tung T Nguyen; Hugo J De Clerck; Lorenzo Franchi; James A McNamara
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Dentofacial effects of two facemask therapies for maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Yuan Shu Ge; Jin Liu; Lin Chen; Jian Li Han; Xin Guo
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Skeletal changes of maxillary protraction without rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Dong-Yul Lee; Eun-Soo Kim; Yong-Kyu Lim; Sug-Joon Ahn
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  New treatment modality for maxillary hypoplasia in cleft patients. Protraction facemask with miniplate anchorage.

Authors:  Seung-Hak Baek; Keun-Woo Kim; Jin-Young Choi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.