Literature DB >> 15517687

Uncertainty assessment for management of soil contaminants with sparse data.

Ute Schnabel1, Olaf Tietje, Roland W Scholz.   

Abstract

In order for soil resources to be sustainably managed, it is necessary to have reliable, valid data on the spatial distribution of their environmental impact. However, in practice, one often has to cope with spatial interpolation achieved from few data that show a skewed distribution and uncertain information about soil contamination. We present a case study with 76 soil samples taken from a site of 15 square km in order to assess the usability of information gleaned from sparse data. The soil was contaminated with cadmium predominantly as a result of airborne emissions from a metal smelter. The spatial interpolation applies lognormal anisotropic kriging and conditional simulation for log-transformed data. The uncertainty of cadmium concentration acquired through data sampling, sample preparation, analytical measurement, and interpolation is factor 2 within 68.3 % confidence. Uncertainty predominantly results from the spatial interpolation necessitated by low sampling density and spatial heterogeneity. The interpolation data are shown in maps presenting likelihoods of exceeding threshold values as a result of a lognormal probability distribution. Although the results are not deterministic, this procedure yields a quantified and transparent estimation of the contamination, which can be used to delineate areas for soil improvement, remediation, or restricted area use, based on the decision-makers' probability safety requirement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15517687     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-003-2971-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  10 in total

1.  Threshold-based resource management: a framework for comprehensive ecosystem management.

Authors:  E roe; M van Eeten
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  European soil sampling guidelines for soil pollution studies.

Authors:  S P Theocharopoulos; G Wagner; J Sprengart; M E Mohr; A Desaules; H Muntau; M Christou; P Quevauviller
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2001-01-08       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Quantitative evaluation of the CEEM soil sampling intercomparison.

Authors:  G Wagner; P Lischer; S Theocharopoulos; H Muntau; A Desaules; P Quevauviller
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2001-01-08       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Description of the test area and reference sampling at Dornach.

Authors:  A Desaules; J Sprengart; G Wagner; H Muntau; S Theocharopoulos
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2001-01-08       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Accounting for source location and transport direction into geostatistical prediction of contaminants.

Authors:  H Saito; P Goovaerts
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  A stochastic empirical model for regional heavy-metal balances in agroecosystems.

Authors:  A Keller; B von Steiger; S E van der Zee; R Schulin
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.751

7.  Geostatistical assessment and validation of uncertainty for three-dimensional dioxin data from sediments in an estuarine river.

Authors:  N Barabás; P Goovaerts; P Adriaens
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Assessment of uncertainty and risk in modeling regional heavy-metal accumulation in agricultural soils.

Authors:  A Keller; K C Abbaspour; R Schulin
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.751

9.  Mapping heavy metals in polluted soil by disjunctive kriging.

Authors:  B von Steiger; R Webster; R Schulin; R Lehmann
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 8.071

10.  Analytical aspects of the CEEM soil project.

Authors:  H Muntau; A Rehnert; A Desaules; G Wagner; S Theocharopoulos; P Quevauviller
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2001-01-08       Impact factor: 7.963

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.