Literature DB >> 15517670

Abdominal hysterectomy and Burch colposuspension for uterovaginal prolapse.

H S Cronjé1, J A A de Beer.   

Abstract

The recurrence rate for prolapse in patients who underwent abdominal hysterectomy and sacrocolposuspension for genital prolapse were determined. Patient records were reviewed and 58 patients who had undergone abdominal hysterectomy for genital prolapse and sacrocolposuspension with mesh were included. The patients' median age was 47.0 years and parity 3. Preoperatively, 25 patients (43%) presented with bladder symptoms, 17 (29%) with bowel symptoms and 45 (78%) with something protruding through the vagina. All patients underwent hysterectomy, of which 51 (88%) were subtotal. Colposuspension was performed by inserting a mesh from the mid-vagina to the sacrum (S1). A Burch colposuspension was performed in 50 patients (87%). The median follow-up was 20 months. Six patients (10%) developed recurrent prolapse, of which five (9%) underwent repeat surgery. There were no mesh erosions. The recurrence rate for prolapse was low, indicating that abdominal hysterectomy with sacrocolposuspension is an excellent option for uterovaginal prolapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15517670     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-004-1186-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  9 in total

1.  Vaginal hysterectomy for correcting genital prolapse. Long-term evaluation.

Authors:  H R Marana; J M Andrade; R R Marana; M Matheus de Sala; P M Philbert; R Rodrigues
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 0.142

2.  Laparoscopic suture hysteropexy for uterine prolapse.

Authors:  C F Maher; M P Carey; C J Murray
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 3.  The use of mesh in gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  C B Iglesia; D E Fenner; L Brubaker
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1997

4.  Sacrospinous colpopexy in the management of uterovaginal prolapse.

Authors:  M S Hoffman; M S Harris; P J Bouis
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 0.142

5.  Supravaginal uterine amputation vs. hysterectomy. Effects on libido and orgasm.

Authors:  P Kilkku; M Grönroos; T Hirvonen; L Rauramo
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  Effects of abdominal hysterectomy on urinary and sexual symptoms.

Authors:  H Virtanen; J Mäkinen; T Tenho; P Kiilholma; Y Pitkänen; T Hirvonen
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1993-12

7.  Supra-vaginal uterine amputation vs. abdominal hysterectomy: the effects on urinary symptoms with special reference to pollakisuria, nocturia and dysuria.

Authors:  P Kilkku; T Hirvonen; M Grönroos
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Successful pregnancies and vaginal deliveries after sacrospinous uterosacral fixation in five of nineteen patients.

Authors:  S R Kovac; S H Cruikshank
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Abdominal versus vaginal approach for the management of genital prolapse and coexisting stress incontinence.

Authors:  J P W R Roovers; J G van der Bom; C H van der Vaart; J H Schagen van Leeuwen; A P M Heintz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2002
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.