Literature DB >> 15513364

Abdominal pain and patient overall and cosmetic satisfaction one year after cholecystectomy: outcome of a randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy.

A Ros1, E Nilsson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies with long-term follow-up after cholecystectomy have shown that residual abdominal symptoms are common. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy (MC) can both give a smoother, early postoperative course than conventional open cholecystectomy (OC). The present study concerns abdominal pain and patient overall and cosmetic satisfaction one year after LC and MC.
METHODS: In a prospective, single-blind study, 724 patients were randomly allocated to LC or MC. Patients completed questionnaires including items concerning abdominal pain before and one year after surgery and overall and cosmetic satisfaction one year after surgery.
RESULTS: There was no difference in reduction of abdominal pain between LC and MC patients. For four different aspects of abdominal pain, 31%, 24%, 30% and 16% of patients operated with LC reported residual abdominal pain one year after surgery. The corresponding figures for MC were 28%, 20%, 27% and 18% (P values 0.55, 0.32, 0.55 and 0.63, respectively). According to questionnaire answers, there was no significant difference in the cosmetic result and overall patient satisfaction between LC and MC patients.
CONCLUSIONS: There are no differences between laparoscopic and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy in long-term outcome regarding abdominal pain and patient overall and cosmetic satisfaction. A large proportion of patients have abdominal pain one year after cholecystectomy. Future studies should include preoperative assessment and indications for cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15513364     DOI: 10.1080/00365520410005540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  9 in total

1.  Assessment of cosmetic outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy among women 4 years after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is there a problem?

Authors:  Mark Bignell; Andrew Hindmarsh; Haritharan Nageswaran; Bhavani Mothe; Andrew Jenkinson; David Mahon; Michael Rhodes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomised control trials.

Authors:  Sanjay Purkayastha; Henry S Tilney; Panagiotis Georgiou; Thanos Athanasiou; Paris P Tekkis; Ara W Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Gallstones.

Authors:  Grant Sanders; Andrew N Kingsnorth
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-08-11

4.  A prospective, randomized study comparing minilaparotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a day-surgery procedure: 5-year outcome.

Authors:  Samuli Aspinen; Jukka Harju; Petri Juvonen; Kalevi Karjalainen; Hannu Kokki; Hannu Paajanen; Matti Eskelinen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Ten-year outcome after minilaparotomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  Jukka Harju; Samuli Aspinen; Petri Juvonen; Hannu Kokki; Matti Eskelinen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Transumbilical retrieval of surgical specimens through a multichannel port.

Authors:  Sang Wook Yi; Da Hye Ju; Sang Soo Lee; Woo Seok Sohn
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 7.  Etiologies of Long-Term Postcholecystectomy Symptoms: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carmen S S Latenstein; Sarah Z Wennmacker; Judith J de Jong; Cornelis J H M van Laarhoven; Joost P H Drenth; Philip R de Reuver
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2019-04-14       Impact factor: 2.260

8.  Open cholecystectomy for all patients in the era of laparoscopic surgery - a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jonas Leo; Goran Filipovic; Julia Krementsova; Rickard Norblad; Mattias Söderholm; Erik Nilsson
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Cholecystectomy in Sweden 2000-2003: a nationwide study on procedures, patient characteristics, and mortality.

Authors:  Mats Rosenmüller; Markku M Haapamäki; Pär Nordin; Hans Stenlund; Erik Nilsson
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 3.067

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.