Postmenopausal hormone therapy before and after the women's health initiative study: what consequences?

This review focuses on the question of whether the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) was a test of primary versus secondary cardiovascular benefits of postmenopausal hormone therapy. Evidence is presented to support the conclusion that the WHI was a secondary intervention trial and that primary cardiovascular benefits of hormone therapy are rational, likely, but not yet proven. The review makes clear that hormone therapy is not a 'cardiovascular drug' for the treatment of coronary heart disease; but rather that the public health debate is whether hormone therapy, used for the treatment of menopausal symptoms, provides any cardiovascular benefits that might offset its risk.