Intira Sriprasert1,2, Howard N Hodis1,3,4, Brian Bernick5, Sebastian Mirkin5, Wendy J Mack1,4. 1. Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand. 3. Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA. 4. Atherosclerosis Research Unit, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA. 5. TherapeuticsMD, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
Abstract
Background: To identify the association of estradiol (E2) dose and serum E2 levels with metabolic measures in early (<6 years) compared with late (≥10 years) postmenopausal women from the REPLENISH trial. Material and Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical trial in the United States. Four doses of TX-001HR, an oral combination of E2 and progesterone (P4), and placebo were tested. This analysis included a total of 1,216 early and 297 late postmenopausal women. Linear mixed-effects models tested the association of E2 dose and serum E2 levels with changes in metabolic parameters; total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglyceride (TG), and glucose (GLUC) levels from six visits over 12 months, adjusted for the serum P4 level. Results: A higher E2 dose was significantly associated with lower TC (p = 0.02) and LDL-C (p = 0.002) and higher HDL-C (p = 0.04) levels in early, but not late, postmenopause. With longer time since menopause, the inverse association of E2 dose with TC and LDL-C and positive association with HDL-C were attenuated (interaction p < 0.05). Higher serum E2 levels were significantly associated with lower TC (p = 0.004), LDL-C (p = 0.0001), and fasting blood GLUC (p = 0.003) and higher TG (p = 0.002) levels in early postmenopause. Conclusion: E2 dose differentially affects metabolic measures among early compared with late postmenopausal women. No significant main effect of the serum P4 level was found. As the metabolic parameters studied are risk factors for cardiovascular events, these results support the timing hypothesis of E2 therapy and its cardiovascular benefits.
RCT Entities:
Background: To identify the association of estradiol (E2) dose and serum E2 levels with metabolic measures in early (<6 years) compared with late (≥10 years) postmenopausal women from the REPLENISH trial. Material and Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical trial in the United States. Four doses of TX-001HR, an oral combination of E2 and progesterone (P4), and placebo were tested. This analysis included a total of 1,216 early and 297 late postmenopausal women. Linear mixed-effects models tested the association of E2 dose and serum E2 levels with changes in metabolic parameters; total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglyceride (TG), and glucose (GLUC) levels from six visits over 12 months, adjusted for the serum P4 level. Results: A higher E2 dose was significantly associated with lower TC (p = 0.02) and LDL-C (p = 0.002) and higher HDL-C (p = 0.04) levels in early, but not late, postmenopause. With longer time since menopause, the inverse association of E2 dose with TC and LDL-C and positive association with HDL-C were attenuated (interaction p < 0.05). Higher serum E2 levels were significantly associated with lower TC (p = 0.004), LDL-C (p = 0.0001), and fasting blood GLUC (p = 0.003) and higher TG (p = 0.002) levels in early postmenopause. Conclusion:E2 dose differentially affects metabolic measures among early compared with late postmenopausal women. No significant main effect of the serum P4 level was found. As the metabolic parameters studied are risk factors for cardiovascular events, these results support the timing hypothesis of E2 therapy and its cardiovascular benefits.
Authors: W S Post; P J Goldschmidt-Clermont; C C Wilhide; A W Heldman; M S Sussman; P Ouyang; E E Milliken; J P Issa Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Emelia J Benjamin; Salim S Virani; Clifton W Callaway; Alanna M Chamberlain; Alexander R Chang; Susan Cheng; Stephanie E Chiuve; Mary Cushman; Francesca N Delling; Rajat Deo; Sarah D de Ferranti; Jane F Ferguson; Myriam Fornage; Cathleen Gillespie; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Suzanne E Judd; Daniel Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Chris T Longenecker; Pamela L Lutsey; Jason S Mackey; David B Matchar; Kunihiro Matsushita; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Martin O'Flaherty; Latha P Palaniappan; Ambarish Pandey; Dilip K Pandey; Mathew J Reeves; Matthew D Ritchey; Carlos J Rodriguez; Gregory A Roth; Wayne D Rosamond; Uchechukwu K A Sampson; Gary M Satou; Svati H Shah; Nicole L Spartano; David L Tirschwell; Connie W Tsao; Jenifer H Voeks; Joshua Z Willey; John T Wilkins; Jason Hy Wu; Heather M Alger; Sally S Wong; Paul Muntner Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Roksana Karim; Howard N Hodis; Frank Z Stanczyk; Rogerio A Lobo; Wendy J Mack Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2007-10-09 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Shelley R Salpeter; Judith M E Walsh; Elizabeth Greyber; Thomas M Ormiston; Edwin E Salpeter Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Marissa Kraynak; Molly M Willging; Alex L Kuehlmann; Amita A Kapoor; Matthew T Flowers; Ricki J Colman; Jon E Levine; David H Abbott Journal: J Endocr Soc Date: 2022-04-22
Authors: Eija K Laakkonen; Jari E Karppinen; Satu Lehti; Earric Lee; Emilia Pesonen; Hanna-Kaarina Juppi; Urho M Kujala; Eero A Haapala; Pauliina Aukee; Jari A Laukkanen; Johanna K Ihalainen Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2021-11-30 Impact factor: 5.555