Literature DB >> 15513145

Hemispheric and facial asymmetry: gender differences.

W M Smith1.   

Abstract

Facial asymmetry (facedness) of female and male college students was investigated. Comparisons of facedness were made between 45 female and 45 male Dartmouth undergraduates. Facedness was defined in terms of the relative sizes (in square centimetres) of the two hemifaces. Data were derived from measurements of two-dimensional frontal photographs of the subjects. Reliable differences in facedness were found between the two groups. The females on average were found to be right faced, the males left faced. This difference was interpreted in terms of the contralateral control (below the eyes) of the two sides of the face by the two hemispheres, and the known differences in cognitive processing by the two hemispheres (left hemisphere-verbal; right hemisphere-visuospatial) in females and males. The observed difference in facial asymmetry between the two sexes is attributed to differential muscular development of the two sides of the face as related to the factors just noted. Suggestions are made for further research on facedness, particularly in relation to different age groups.

Year:  2000        PMID: 15513145     DOI: 10.1080/713754376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laterality        ISSN: 1357-650X


  8 in total

1.  Facial asymmetry in young healthy subjects evaluated by statistical shape analysis.

Authors:  Ilker Ercan; Senem Turan Ozdemir; Abdullah Etoz; Deniz Sigirli; R Shane Tubbs; Marios Loukas; Ibrahim Guney
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Three-dimensional quantification of facial symmetry in adolescents using laser surface scanning.

Authors:  Jelena Djordjevic; Arshed M Toma; Alexei I Zhurov; Stephen Richmond
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Evaluation of facial asymmetry by stereophotogrammetry in individuals with unilateral maxillary impacted canine.

Authors:  Ahmet Oğuz Şahan; Burçin Akan
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  An assessment of sexual dimorphism in relation to facial asymmetry in esthetically pleasing faces.

Authors:  Yagnesh Rajpara; Tarulatha R Shyagali
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2015-02-22

5.  Prevalence of facial asymmetry in Tirupati population: A posteroanterior cephalometric and photographic study.

Authors:  M Radhika Reddy; Srinivasa R Bogavilli; V Raghavendra; Venkata S Polina; Shaik Z Basha; R Preetham
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2016-12

6.  Socioeconomic Status Is Not Related with Facial Fluctuating Asymmetry: Evidence from Latin-American Populations.

Authors:  Mirsha Quinto-Sánchez; Celia Cintas; Caio Cesar Silva de Cerqueira; Virginia Ramallo; Victor Acuña-Alonzo; Kaustubh Adhikari; Lucía Castillo; Jorge Gomez-Valdés; Paola Everardo; Francisco De Avila; Tábita Hünemeier; Claudia Jaramillo; Williams Arias; Macarena Fuentes; Carla Gallo; Giovani Poletti; Lavinia Schuler-Faccini; Maria Cátira Bortolini; Samuel Canizales-Quinteros; Francisco Rothhammer; Gabriel Bedoya; Javier Rosique; Andrés Ruiz-Linares; Rolando González-José
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Laterality and Left-sidedness in the Nose, Face, and Body: A New Finding.

Authors:  Farhad Hafezi; Ali Javdani; Bijan Naghibzadeh; Abbas Kazemi Ashtiani
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-12-28

8.  Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex in typically developing children: Laterality analysis.

Authors:  Jue Wang; Ning Yang; Wei Liao; Han Zhang; Chao-Gan Yan; Yu-Feng Zang; Xi-Nian Zuo
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 6.464

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.