Literature DB >> 15512973

The precautionary principle and medical decision making.

David B Resnik1.   

Abstract

The precautionary principle is a useful strategy for decision-making when physicians and patients lack evidence relating to the potential outcomes associated with various choices. According to a version of the principle defended here, one should take reasonable measures to avoid threats that are serious and plausible. The reasonableness of a response to a threat depends on several factors, including benefit vs. harm, realism, proportionality, and consistency. Since a concept of reasonableness plays an essential role in applying the precautionary principle, this principle gives physicians and patients a decision-making strategy that encourages the careful weighing and balancing of different values that one finds in humanistic approaches to clinical reasoning. Properly understood, the principle presents a worthwhile alternative to approaches to clinical reasoning that apply expected utility theory to decision problems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Health Care and Public Health; Philosophical Approach

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15512973     DOI: 10.1080/03605310490500509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  10 in total

1.  Should the precautionary principle guide our actions or our beliefs?

Authors:  M Peterson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Disclosure of individualized research results: a precautionary approach.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  On deciding to have a lobotomy: either lobotomies were justified or decisions under risk should not always seek to maximise expected utility.

Authors:  Rachel Cooper
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2014-02

Review 4.  Best practices in policy approaches to obesity prevention.

Authors:  Ashley M Fox; Carol R Horowitz
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2013

Review 5.  Conceptual, methodological, and ethical problems in communicating uncertainty in clinical evidence.

Authors:  Paul K J Han
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.929

6.  Analyzing the effectiveness of teaching and factors in clinical decision-making.

Authors:  Ming-Chen Hsieh; Ming-Shinn Lee; Tsung-Ying Chen; Tsuen-Chiuan Tsai; Yi-Fong Pai; Min-Muh Sheu
Journal:  Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

Review 7.  Patient autonomy and disclosure of material information about hospital-acquired infections.

Authors:  Sorin Hostiuc; Arthur-Jozsef Molnar; Alin Moldoveanu; Maria Aluaş; Florica Moldoveanu; Iuliana Bocicor; Maria-Iuliana Dascalu; Elisabeta Bădilă; Mihaela Hostiuc; Ionut Negoi
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Applying Genetic and Genomic Tools to Psychiatric Disorders: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ana S IItis; Akaya Lewis; Sarah Neely; Stephannie Walker Seaton; Sarah H Jeong
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2021-11-30

Review 9.  Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: An Evolutionary Adaptation to Lifestyle and the Environment.

Authors:  Jim Parker; Claire O'Brien; Jason Hawrelak; Felice L Gersh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Re-focusing the ethical discourse on personalized medicine: a qualitative interview study with stakeholders in the German healthcare system.

Authors:  Sebastian Schleidgen; Georg Marckmann
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 2.652

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.