Literature DB >> 15509923

Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device in cleft maxillary deformities.

Alvaro A Figueroa1, John W Polley, Hans Friede, Ellen W Ko.   

Abstract

Rigid external distraction is a highly effective technique for correction of maxillary hypoplasia in patients with orofacial clefts. The clinical results after correction of sagittal maxillary deformities in both the adult and pediatric age groups have been stable. The purpose of this retrospective longitudinal cephalometric study was to review the long-term stability of the repositioned maxilla in cleft patients who underwent maxillary advancement with rigid external distraction. Between April 1, 1995, and April 1, 1999, 17 consecutive patients with cleft maxillary hypoplasia underwent maxillary advancement using rigid external distraction. There were 13 male patients and four female patients, with ages ranging from 5.2 to 23.6 years (mean, 12.6 years). After a modified complete high Le Fort I osteotomy and a latency period of 3 to 5 days, patients underwent maxillary advancement with rigid external distraction until proper facial convexity and dental overjet and overbite were obtained. After active distraction, a 3- to 4-week period of rigid retention was undertaken; this was followed by removable elastic retention for 6 to 8 weeks using, during sleep time, an orthodontic protraction face mask. Cephalometric radiographs were obtained preoperatively, after distraction, at 1 year after distraction, and 2 or more years after distraction. The mean follow-up was 3.3 years (minimum, 2.1 years; maximum, 5.3 years). The following measurements were obtained in each cephalogram: three linear horizontal and two linear vertical maxillary measurements, two angular craniomaxillary measurements, and one craniomandibular measurement. Differences between the preoperative and postoperative cephalometric values were analyzed by paired t tests (p < 0.05). The cephalometric analysis demonstrated postoperatively significant advancement of the maxilla. In addition, the mandibular plane angle opened 1.2 degrees after surgery. After the 1- to 3-year follow-up period, the maxilla was stable in the sagittal plane. Minimal anteroposterior growth was observed in the maxilla compared with that exhibited in the anterior cranial base. However, there was significant vertical maxillary growth over the 3-year observation period. The mandibular plane angle tended to decrease during the follow-up period. The cephalometric data from this study support the clinical impression of maxillary stability after maxillary advancement with rigid external distraction in cleft patients. This effective and stable technique is now considered for all pediatric patients with severe cleft maxillary hypoplasia and for adolescent and adult patients with moderate to severe deformities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15509923     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000138593.89303.1b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  28 in total

1.  Le fort I maxillary advancement using distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Patrick D Combs; Raymond J Harshbarger
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Immediate Reconstruction of Large Full-Thickness Segmental Anterior Maxillary Defect with Bone Transport.

Authors:  Alberto Rocha Pereira; Nuno Montezuma; Luis Oliveira; Miguel Magalhães; José Rosa
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2016-09-15

Review 3.  A review of reconstructive materials for use in craniofacial surgery bone fixation materials, bone substitutes, and distractors.

Authors:  James Tait Goodrich; Adam L Sandler; Oren Tepper
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Cranio-maxillofacial, orthodontic and dental treatment in three patients with Apert syndrome.

Authors:  S Carpentier; J Schoenaers; C Carels; A Verdonck
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2014-03-19

5.  An interview with Alvaro Alfredo Figueroa.

Authors:  Alvaro Alfredo Figueroa; Eduardo Franzotti Sant'Anna; Mônica Tirre de Souza Araujo; Geórgia Wain Thi Lau; Lúcio Henrique E G Maia
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

6.  Anterior maxillary segmental distraction in the treatment of severe maxillary hypoplasia secondary to cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Hongliang Li; Jiewen Dai; Jiawen Si; Jianfei Zhang; Minjiao Wang; Steve Guofang Shen; Hongbo Yu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

7.  An Update on Midface Advancement Using Le Fort II and III Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Youssef Tahiri; Jesse Taylor
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.314

8.  Orthodontic considerations for maxillary distraction osteogenesis in growing patients with cleft lip and palate using internal distractors.

Authors:  Adriana da Silveira; Pollyana Marques de Moura; Raymond J Harshbarger
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.314

9.  Soft Tissue Changes in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: Anterior Maxillary Distraction versus Conventional Le-Fort I Osteotomy.

Authors:  Eldho Markose; Joby Paulose; Eldho T Paul
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-01-18

10.  The Changes in Upper Airway Volume after Orthognathic Surgery Evaluated by Individual Segmentation on CBCT Images.

Authors:  Cosmin Ioan Faur; Raluca Ancuta Roman; Simion Bran; Cristian Dinu; Alina Coclici; Horatiu Rotaru; Mihaela Hedesiu
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2019-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.