Literature DB >> 26629107

Anterior maxillary segmental distraction in the treatment of severe maxillary hypoplasia secondary to cleft lip and palate.

Hongliang Li1, Jiewen Dai1, Jiawen Si1, Jianfei Zhang1, Minjiao Wang1, Steve Guofang Shen1, Hongbo Yu1.   

Abstract

Anterior maxillary segmental distraction (AMSD) is an effective surgical procedure in the treatment of maxillary hypoplasia secondary to cleft lip and palate. Its unique advantage of preserving velopharyngeal function makes this procedure widely applied. In this study, the application of AMSD was described and its long-term stability was explored. Eight patients with severe maxillary hypoplasia secondary to CLP were included in this study. They were treated with AMSD using rigid external distraction (RED) device. Cephalometric analysis was performed twice at three time points for evaluation: before surgery (T1), after distraction (T2), and 2 years after treatment (T3). One-way analysis of variance was used to assess the differences statistically. All the distractions completed smoothly, and maxilla was distracted efficiently. The value of SNA, NA-FH, Ptm-A, U1-PP, overjet and PP (ANS-PNS) increased significantly after the AMSD procedure (P < 0.05), with the mean overjet increased by 14.28 mm. However, comparison of cephalometric analysis between T2 and T3 showed no significant difference (P > 0.05). Changes of palatopharyngeal depth and soft palatal length were insignificant. AMSD with RED device provided an effective way to correct maxillary hypoplasia secondary to CLP, extended the palatal and arch length, avoided damage on velopharyngeal closure function and reduced the relapse rate. It is a promising and valuable technique in this potentially complicated procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AMSD; CLP; VPI; maxillary hypoplasia; stability

Year:  2015        PMID: 26629107      PMCID: PMC4658996     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  25 in total

1.  Longitudinal cephalometric analysis after maxillary distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Michael Krimmel; Carl-Peter Cornelius; Margit Bacher; Dirk Gülicher; Siegmar Reinert
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  Maxillary anterior segmental advancement of hypoplastic maxilla in cleft patients by distraction osteogenesis: report of 2 cases.

Authors:  Alper Alkan; Burcu Baş; Mete Ozer; Mehmet Bayram; Emir Yüzbasioğlu
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Cephalometric evaluation of patients treated by maxillary anterior segmental distraction: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Osman Bengi; Seniz Karaçay; Erol Akin; Kemal Murat Okçu; Hüseyin Olmez; Sila Mermut
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Maxillary anterior segmental distraction osteogenesis with the dynaform system for severe maxillary retrusion in cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Seiji Iida; Takakazu Yagi; Takashi Yamashiro; Masaya Okura; Kenji Takada; Mikihiko Kogo
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Management of severe maxillary deficiency in childhood and adolescence through distraction osteogenesis with an external, adjustable, rigid distraction device.

Authors:  J W Polley; A A Figueroa
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.046

6.  Effect of maxillomandibular advancement on morphology of velopharyngeal space.

Authors:  Tetsushi Okushi; Morio Tonogi; Takehiro Arisaka; Sayuri Kobayashi; Yusuke Tsukamoto; Hitoshi Morishita; Kazumichi Sato; Chiemi Sano; Shintaro Chiba; Gen-Yuki Yamane; Tsuneya Nakajima
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Comparative study of different osteotomy modalities in maxillary distraction osteogenesis for cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Hongbo Yu; Xudong Wang; Bing Fang; Steve Guofang Shen
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Unilateral advancement of the maxillary minor segment by distraction osteogenesis in patients with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate: report of two cases.

Authors:  Kazuto Kuroe; Shoichiro Iino; Kenji Shomura; Akiro Okubo; Kazumasa Sugihara; Gakuji Ito
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2003-05

9.  Morphological evaluation of changes in velopharyngeal function following maxillary distraction in patients with repaired cleft palate during mixed dentition.

Authors:  Koichi Satoh; Junko Nagata; Kenji Shomura; Takeshi Wada; Takashi Tachimura; Jinichi Fukuda; Ryosuke Shiba
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2004-07

10.  Use of distraction osteogenesis in cleft palate patients.

Authors:  Ki Chul Tae; Seiw Ging Gong; Song Ki Min; Song Whan Oh
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.079

View more
  1 in total

1.  Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients with Rigid External Distraction System.

Authors:  Shadi Alkhouri; Peter D Waite; Matthew B Davis; Ejvis Lamani; Chung How Kau
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017 Jan-Jun
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.