Literature DB >> 15508986

Clinical evaluation of small-diameter implants in single-tooth and multiple-implant restorations: a 7-year retrospective study.

Paolo Vigolo1, Andrea Givani, Zeina Majzoub, Giampiero Cordioli.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Placement of small-diameter implants often provides a solution to space-related problems in implant restoration. This 7-year retrospective study presents results from 192 small-diameter implants placed in 165 patients from 1992 to 1996.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The dental records of each patient were reviewed. The implants, which were either 2.9 mm or 3.25 mm in diameter, were placed by 2 different surgeons. All prosthetic appliances were fabricated by the same prosthodontist. Ninety-four implants supported single-tooth cemented restorations; the remaining 98 implants supported cemented or screw-retained partial prostheses.
RESULTS: The total implant survival rate was 95.3%. Four implants were lost at second-stage surgery, and 5 more were lost after loading. DISCUSSION: Small-diameter implants demonstrated a survival rate similar to those reported in previous studies of standard-size implants.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that small-diameter implants can be successfully included in implant treatment. They may be preferable in cases where space is limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15508986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  8 in total

1.  Application of the 2-piece orthodontic C-implant for provisional restoration with laser welded customized coping: a case report.

Authors:  Janghyun Paek; Hyo-Won Ahn; Do-Min Jeong; Jeong-Seok Shim; Seong-Hun Kim; Kyu-Rhim Chung
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.151

2.  Clinical outcome of narrow diameter implants inserted into allografts.

Authors:  Maurizio Franco; Alessandro Viscioni; Leone Rigo; Riccardo Guidi; Ilaria Zollino; Anna Avantaggiato; Francesco Carinci
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  A pilot randomised controlled trial evaluating mini and conventional implant retained dentures on the function and quality of life of patients with an edentulous mandible.

Authors:  Sarra Jawad; Craig Barclay; William Whittaker; Martin Tickle; Tanya Walsh
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  Influence of risk factors on the long-term survival of oral rehabilitation with extra-narrow implants: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Elcio Marcantonio Junior; Ivete Aparecida de Mattias Sartori; Camila Pereira Vianna; Roberta Schroder Rocha; Waleska Caldas; Larissa Carvalho Trojan
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.144

5.  Narrow diameter implant in posterior region.

Authors:  Jumshad B Mohamed; Md Nazish Alam; Arif Salman; S C Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2012-10

6.  Therapeutic Challenge in a Severely Atrophic Mandible.

Authors:  Edvard Janev; Nadica Janeva; Marija Peeva-Petreska; Kristina Mitic
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-10

7.  Clinical research on a flapless surgical technique application of narrow implants.

Authors:  Li Xu; Yihan Liu; Yuanyuan Wang; Jiangang Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Longevity and marginal bone loss of narrow-diameter implants supporting single crowns: A systematic review.

Authors:  Lucas Henrique Telles; Fernando Freitas Portella; Elken Gomes Rivaldo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.