Literature DB >> 15508003

Assessing genetic contributions to phenotypic differences among 'racial' and 'ethnic' groups.

Joanna L Mountain1, Neil Risch.   

Abstract

Descriptions of human genetic variation given thirty years ago have held up well, considering the substantial accrual of DNA sequence data in the interim. Most importantly, estimates of between-group genetic variation have remained relatively low. Despite the low average level of between-group variation, clusters recently inferred from multilocus genetic data coincide closely with groups defined by self-identified race or continental ancestry. This correspondence implies that genetic factors might contribute to unexplained between-group phenotypic variation. Current understanding of the contribution of genes to variation in most complex traits is limited, however. Under these circumstances, assumptions about genetic contributions to group differences are unfounded. In the absence of detailed understanding, 'racial' and 'ethnic' categories will remain useful in biomedical research. Further, we suggest approaches and guidelines for assessing the contribution of genetic factors to between-group phenotypic differences, including studies of candidate genes and analyses of recently admixed populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15508003     DOI: 10.1038/ng1456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   38.330


  36 in total

1.  Estimating the contribution of genetic variants to difference in incidence of disease between population groups.

Authors:  Ramal Moonesinghe; John P A Ioannidis; W Dana Flanders; Quanhe Yang; Benedict I Truman; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Latino populations: a unique opportunity for the study of race, genetics, and social environment in epidemiological research.

Authors:  Esteban González Burchard; Luisa N Borrell; Shweta Choudhry; Mariam Naqvi; Hui-Ju Tsai; Jose R Rodriguez-Santana; Rocio Chapela; Scott D Rogers; Rui Mei; William Rodriguez-Cintron; Jose F Arena; Rick Kittles; Eliseo J Perez-Stable; Elad Ziv; Neil Risch
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Examination of ancestry and ethnic affiliation using highly informative diallelic DNA markers: application to diverse and admixed populations and implications for clinical epidemiology and forensic medicine.

Authors:  Nan Yang; Hongzhe Li; Lindsey A Criswell; Peter K Gregersen; Marta E Alarcon-Riquelme; Rick Kittles; Russell Shigeta; Gabriel Silva; Pragna I Patel; John W Belmont; Michael F Seldin
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  The ambiguous meanings of the racial/ethnic categories routinely used in human genetics research.

Authors:  Linda M Hunt; Mary S Megyesi
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Comparison of statistical methods for estimating genetic admixture in a lung cancer study of African Americans and Latinos.

Authors:  Melinda C Aldrich; Steve Selvin; Helen M Hansen; Lisa F Barcellos; Margaret R Wrensch; Jennette D Sison; Charles P Quesenberry; Rick A Kittles; Gabriel Silva; Patricia A Buffler; Michael F Seldin; John K Wiencke
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 6.  The use of racial, ethnic, and ancestral categories in human genetics research.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-08-29       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Advancing genomic research and reducing health disparities: what can nurse scholars do?

Authors:  Cheedy Jaja; Robert Gibson; Shirley Quarles
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.176

8.  Racial differences in genetic and environmental risk to preterm birth.

Authors:  Timothy P York; Jerome F Strauss; Michael C Neale; Lindon J Eaves
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Cancer pharmacoethnicity: ethnic differences in susceptibility to the effects of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Peter H O'Donnell; M Eileen Dolan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Triple-negative breast cancers are increased in black women regardless of age or body mass index.

Authors:  Lesley A Stead; Timothy L Lash; Jerome E Sobieraj; Dorcas D Chi; Jennifer L Westrup; Marjory Charlot; Rita A Blanchard; John C Lee; Thomas C King; Carol L Rosenberg
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.