Literature DB >> 15507007

Are differences between graduates and undergraduates in a medical course due to age or prior degree?

Tim J Wilkinson1, J Elisabeth Wells, John A Bushnell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The number of medical programmes targeted at graduates is increasing and there are reports of beneficial outcomes. However, many new graduate medical schools have simultaneously changed their admission criteria and curricula. This study aimed to determine whether there were differences between graduates and undergraduates on the same medical course and to establish which differences might be due to having a prior degree, the course itself or age at entry to medical school.
METHODS: A questionnaire-based survey was administered to all students in Years 2-5. It included the Study Process Questionnaire, the Achievement Motivation Profile and Likert scale questions on career.
RESULTS: Questionnaires were completed by 587 students (response rate 80.3%), of whom 143 had a prior degree. Whilst having a prior degree was associated with many outcomes, for most this disappeared, and the overall predictive ability of the model improved when age was included. Age at entry to medical school brought certainty and motivation about career choice, a prior degree had some effect on approaches to studying and co-operativeness, while the course itself had effects on most outcomes, some of which were positive and some negative.
CONCLUSION: Graduates bring a distinct quality to a course but many of these relate to a student's age. Older age at entry may be more important than having a prior degree.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15507007     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01981.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  24 in total

1.  Perception of educational environment among undergraduate students in a chiropractic training institution.

Authors:  Per J Palmgren; Madawa Chandratilake
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2011

2.  Students' perceived stress and perception of barriers to effective study: impact on academic performance in examinations.

Authors:  J Turner; D Bartlett; M Andiappan; L Cabot
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Polemic: five proposals for a medical school admission policy.

Authors:  C Cowley
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Should all medical students be graduates first? Yes.

Authors:  Ed Peile
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-11-24

Review 5.  The effects of problem-based learning during medical school on physician competency: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gerald Choon-Huat Koh; Hoon Eng Khoo; Mee Lian Wong; David Koh
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Examination performance of graduate entry medical students compared with mainstream students.

Authors:  Melanie J Calvert; Nick M Ross; Nick Freemantle; Yong Xu; Remigio Zvauya; Jim V Parle
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Predictive value of the admissions process and the UK Clinical Aptitude Test in a graduate-entry dental school.

Authors:  J I Foley; K Hijazi
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.626

8.  Introducing point-of-care ultrasound through structured multifaceted ultrasound module in the undergraduate medical curriculum at the University of Hong Kong.

Authors:  Benedicte Coiffier; Pascale Chung Hang Shen; Elaine Yuen Phin Lee; Teresa Sui Ping Kwong; Alta Yee Tak Lai; Esther Man Fung Wong; Keith Wan Hang Chiu; Varut Vardhanabhuti; Pek Lan Khong
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2019-05-17

9.  Comparative attainment of 5-year undergraduate and 4-year graduate entry medical students moving into foundation training.

Authors:  Gillian Manning; Paul Garrud
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Effects of age, gender and educational background on strength of motivation for medical school.

Authors:  Rashmi Kusurkar; Cas Kruitwagen; Olle ten Cate; Gerda Croiset
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.