Literature DB >> 15504017

Exploring the consequences of postmating-prezygotic interactions between the sexes.

L Lacey Knowles1, B Brodie Hernandez, Therese A Markow.   

Abstract

The role of male-female interactions in the divergence of postmating-prezygotic reproductive traits has recently focused on sexual conflict as the selective force. While an association between mating costs and benefits suggests that antagonistic interactions may be important, a mosaic of processes may actually mediate the evolutionary dynamics of postmating-prezygotic interactions. Our study examines the ecological relevance of mating effects on females. We test this critical but often overlooked assumption in desert Drosophila, where the species' ecology provides a framework for evaluating the evolutionary implications of such mating consequences. We show that mating has a profound impact on an ecologically critical character--desiccation resistance. To explore what selective factors might underlie the observed population differences in mating effects, we test whether trends in the data match predictions based on the species' ecology. While these preliminary data are consistent with the expectation that the mating benefits are positively correlated with environmental conditions, further examination reveals an additional unanticipated association with the reproductive environment. This unexpected association challenges existing assumptions regarding the forces driving divergence of traits involved in mating.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15504017      PMCID: PMC1810077          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  9 in total

1.  Costs and the diversification of exaggerated animal structures.

Authors:  D J Emlen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-02-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load.

Authors:  B Holland; W R Rice
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sexually antagonistic coevolution of a postmating-prezygotic reproductive character in desert Drosophila.

Authors:  L L Knowles; T A Markow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The mechanisms of morph determination in the amphipod Jassa: implications for the evolution of alternative male phenotypes.

Authors:  Josepha P Kurdziel; L Lacey Knowles
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Sex and conflict.

Authors:  L Partridge; L D Hurst
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-09-25       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Evolutionary EST analysis identifies rapidly evolving male reproductive proteins in Drosophila.

Authors:  W J Swanson; A G Clark; H M Waldrip-Dail; M F Wolfner; C F Aquadro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products.

Authors:  T Chapman; L F Liddle; J M Kalb; M F Wolfner; L Partridge
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-01-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  The gifts that keep on giving: physiological functions and evolutionary dynamics of male seminal proteins in Drosophila.

Authors:  M F Wolfner
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  High divergence of reproductive tract proteins and their association with postzygotic reproductive isolation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis group species.

Authors:  A Civetta; R S Singh
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.395

  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  Ecological divergence promotes the evolution of cryptic reproductive isolation.

Authors:  Patrik Nosil; Bernard J Crespi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Conflict between direct and indirect benefits of female choice in desert Drosophila.

Authors:  Elen Onealt; Tim Connallon; L Lacey Knowles
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Strain-dependent differences in several reproductive traits are not accompanied by early postmating transcriptome changes in female Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Lisa A McGraw; Greg Gibson; Andrew G Clark; Mariana F Wolfner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Reinforcement of gametic isolation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Daniel R Matute
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  Gene duplication and adaptive evolution of digestive proteases in Drosophila arizonae female reproductive tracts.

Authors:  Erin S Kelleher; Willie J Swanson; Therese A Markow
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 5.917

6.  Transcriptional regulation of metabolism associated with the increased desiccation resistance of the cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis.

Authors:  Luciano M Matzkin; Therese A Markow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The Rate of Evolution of Postmating-Prezygotic Reproductive Isolation in Drosophila.

Authors:  David A Turissini; Joseph A McGirr; Sonali S Patel; Jean R David; Daniel R Matute
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  The magnitude of behavioral isolation is affected by characteristics of the mating community.

Authors:  Daniel R Matute
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.