Literature DB >> 15503323

Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy.

Hiroshi Yoshioka1, Kathryn Stevens, Brian A Hargreaves, Daniel Steines, Mark Genovese, Michael F Dillingham, Carl S Winalski, Philipp Lang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare signal-to-noise ratios (S/N) and contrast-to-noise ratios (C/N) in various MR sequences, including fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo (SPGR) imaging, fat-suppressed fast spin echo (FSE) imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional driven equilibrium Fourier transform (DEFT) imaging, and to determine the diagnostic accuracy of these imaging sequences for detecting cartilage lesions in osteoarthritic knees, as compared with arthroscopy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two sagittal fat-suppressed FSE images (repetition time [TR] / echo time [TE], 4000/13 [FSE short TE] and 4000/39 [FSE long TE]), sagittal fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR images (60/5, 40 degrees flip angle), and sagittal fat-suppressed echo-planar three-dimensional DEFT images (400/21.2) were acquired in 35 knees from 28 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. The S/N efficiencies (S/Neffs) of cartilage, synovial fluid, muscle, meniscus, bone marrow, and fat tissue, and the C/N efficiencies (C/Neffs) of these structures were calculated. Kappa values, exact agreement, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were determined by comparison of MR grading with arthroscopic results.
RESULTS: The synovial fluid S/Neff on fat-suppressed FSE short TE images, fat-suppressed FSE long TE images, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT images showed similar values. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT images showed the highest fluid-cartilage C/Neff of all sequences. All images showed fair to good agreement with arthroscopy (kappa, 0.615 in FSE short TE, 0.601 in FSE long TE, 0.583 in three-dimensional SPGR, and 0.561 in three-dimensional DEFT). Although the sensitivity of all sequences was high (100% in FSE short TE, FSE long TE, and DEFT; 96.7% in SPGR), specificity was relatively low (67.6% in FSE short TE and FSE long TE; 85.3% in SPGR; 58.3% in DEFT). The peripheral area of bone marrow edema or whole area of bone marrow edema on fat-suppressed FSE images was demonstrated as low or iso-signal intensity on fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT images.
CONCLUSION: Fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging and fat-suppressed FSE imaging showed high sensitivity and high negative predictive values, but relatively low specificity. The Kappa value and exact agreement was the highest on fat-suppressed FSE short TE images. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT images showed results similar to the conventional sequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15503323     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  44 in total

1.  Proton density-weighted MR imaging of the knee: fat suppression versus without fat suppression.

Authors:  So-Yeon Lee; Won-Hee Jee; Sun Ki Kim; Jung-Man Kim
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-05-30       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and computed tomography for the detection of chondral lesions of the knee.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Benjamin T Drew; Andoni P Toms; Simon T Donell; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  [Pitfalls in magnetic resonance imaging of the knee].

Authors:  M Zanetti; C W A Pfirrmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  MR imaging of autologous chondrocyte implantation of the knee.

Authors:  S L J James; D A Connell; A Saifuddin; J A Skinner; T W R Briggs
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  [Molecular imaging: future uses in arthritides].

Authors:  M H Brem; P M Schlechtweg; J Mackenzie; C S Winalski; P Lang
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Routine clinical knee MR reports: comparison of diagnostic performance at 1.5 T and 3.0 T for assessment of the articular cartilage.

Authors:  Jacob C Mandell; Jeffrey A Rhodes; Nehal Shah; Glenn C Gaviola; Andreas H Gomoll; Stacy E Smith
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Quantitative measurement of femoral condyle cartilage in the knee by MRI: validation study by multireaders.

Authors:  Yasunari Fujinaga; Hiroshi Yoshioka; Toshinori Sakai; Yoko Sakai; Felipe Souza; Philipp Lang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Use magnetic resonance imaging to assess articular cartilage.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Anita E Wluka; Graeme Jones; Changhai Ding; Flavia M Cicuttini
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.346

9.  The association between subchondral bone cysts and tibial cartilage volume and risk of joint replacement in people with knee osteoarthritis: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Stephanie K Tanamas; Anita E Wluka; Jean-Pierre Pelletier; Johanne Martel-Pelletier; François Abram; Yuanyuan Wang; Flavia M Cicuttini
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 5.156

10.  How reliable is MRI in diagnosing cartilaginous lesions in patients with first and recurrent lateral patellar dislocations?

Authors:  Lars V von Engelhardt; Marthina Raddatz; Bertil Bouillon; Gunter Spahn; Andreas Dàvid; Patrick Haage; Thomas K Lichtinger
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.