| Literature DB >> 15503122 |
K Koppo1, B J Whipp, A M Jones, D Aeyels, J Bouckaert.
Abstract
We have previously observed that following the onset of moderate intensity cycle ergometry, the pulmonary O2 uptake (VO2) in trained cyclists often does not increase towards its steady-state value with the typical mono-exponential characteristics; rather, there is a transient "overshoot". The purpose of this study was to systematically examine this phenomenon by comparing the VO2 responses to two moderate-intensity work rates and one high-intensity work rate in trained and untrained subjects. Following a ramp exercise test to the limit of tolerance for the determination of the gas exchange threshold (GET) and VO2(peak), seven trained cyclists [mean (SD); VO2(peak) 66.6 (2.5) ml x kg(-1) x min(-1)] and eight sedentary subjects [VO2(peak) 42.9 (5.1) ml x kg(-1) x min(-1)] completed six step transitions from baseline cycling to work rates requiring 60% and 80% GET and three step transitions from baseline cycling to a work rate requiring 50% of the difference between GET and VO2(peak) (50%delta). VO2 was measured breath-by-breath and modelled using standard techniques. The sedentary subjects did not overshoot the steady-state VO2 at any intensity. At 60% GET, six of the seven cyclists overshot the steady-state VO2 [by an integral volume of 164 (44) ml between approximately 45 and 125 s]. At 80% GET, four of the seven cyclists overshot the steady-state VO2 [by an integral volume of 185 (92) ml between approximately 55 and 140 s]. None of the cyclists showed an overshoot at 50%delta. These results indicate that trained cyclists evidence an overshoot in VO2 before steady-state is reached in the transition to moderate-intensity exercise. The mechanism(s) responsible for this effect remains to be elucidated, as does whether the overshoot confers any functional or performance benefit to the trained cyclist.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15503122 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-004-1229-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol ISSN: 1439-6319 Impact factor: 3.078