Literature DB >> 15502027

The effects of propofol, small-dose isoflurane, and nitrous oxide on cortical somatosensory evoked potential and bispectral index monitoring in adolescents undergoing spinal fusion.

Anthony J Clapcich1, Ronald G Emerson, David P Roye, Hui Xie, Edward J Gallo, Kathy C Dowling, Brian Ramnath, Eric J Heyer.   

Abstract

In this study we compared the effects of propofol, small-dose isoflurane, and nitrous oxide (N(2)O) on cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) and bispectral index (BIS) monitoring in adolescents undergoing spinal fusion. Twelve patients received the following anesthetic maintenance combinations in a randomly determined order: treatment #1: isoflurane 0.4% + N(2)O 70% + O(2) 30%; treatment #2: isoflurane 0.6% + N(2)O 70% + O(2) 30%; treatment #3: isoflurane 0.6% + air + O(2) 30%; treatment #4: propofol 120 microg . kg(-1) . min(-1) + air + O(2) 30%. Cortical SSEP amplitudes measured during anesthesia maintenance with treatment #3 (isoflurane 0.6%/air) were more than those measured during maintenance with treatment #1 (isoflurane 0.4%/N(2)O 70%) (P < 0.0001) and treatment #2 (isoflurane 0.6%/N(2)O 70%) (P < 0.0052). Cortical SSEP amplitudes measured during treatment #4 (propofol 120 microg . kg(-1) . min(-1)/air) were more than treatment #1 (isoflurane 0.4%/N(2)O 70%) (P < 0.0001), treatment #2 (Iso 0.6%/N(2)O 70%) (P < 0.0007), and treatment #3 (isoflurane 0.6%/air) (P < 0.0191). In addition, average BIS values measured during treatments 1, 2, 3 and 4 were 62, 62, 61, and 44 respectively. Only treatment #4 (propofol 120 microg . kg(-1) . min(-1)/air) uniformly maintained BIS values less than 60. Our study demonstrates that propofol better preserves cortical SSEP amplitude measurement and provides a deeper level of hypnosis as measured by BIS values than combinations of small-dose isoflurane/N(2)O or small-dose isoflurane alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15502027      PMCID: PMC2435242          DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000134807.73615.5C

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   6.627


  39 in total

1.  Median nerve evoked potentials during propofol anaesthesia.

Authors:  G L Scheepstra; J J de Lange; L H Booij; H H Ros
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Bispectral analysis measures sedation and memory effects of propofol, midazolam, isoflurane, and alfentanil in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  P S Glass; M Bloom; L Kearse; C Rosow; P Sebel; P Manberg
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Effects of halothane, enflurane, isoflurane, and nitrous oxide on somatosensory evoked potentials in humans.

Authors:  D O Peterson; J C Drummond; M M Todd
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Bispectral analysis of the electroencephalogram predicts conscious processing of information during propofol sedation and hypnosis.

Authors:  L A Kearse; C Rosow; A Zaslavsky; P Connors; M Dershwitz; W Denman
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  The comparative amnestic effects of midazolam, propofol, thiopental, and fentanyl at equisedative concentrations.

Authors:  R A Veselis; R A Reinsel; V A Feshchenko; M Wroński
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Victims of awareness.

Authors:  C Lennmarken; K Bildfors; G Enlund; P Samuelsson; R Sandin
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.105

7.  Comparison of the effects of sevoflurane and propofol on cortical somatosensory evoked potentials.

Authors:  N Boisseau; M Madany; P Staccini; G Armando; F Martin; D Grimaud; M Raucoules-Aimé
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Awareness: Monitoring versus remembering what happened.

Authors:  Chantal Kerssens; Jan Klein; Benno Bonke
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Total intravenous anesthesia for improvement of intraoperative monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during aneurysm surgery.

Authors:  M Taniguchi; J Nadstawek; U Pechstein; J Schramm
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Bispectral EEG index during nitrous oxide administration.

Authors:  I J Rampil; J S Kim; R Lenhardt; C Negishi; D I Sessler
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  3 in total

1.  A comparison of the effects of desflurane versus propofol on transcranial motor-evoked potentials in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Robert N Holdefer; Corrie Anderson; Michele Furman; Yoro Sangare; Jefferson C Slimp
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Analgesic effects of methadone and magnesium following posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  David P Martin; Walter P Samora; Allan C Beebe; Jan Klamar; Laura Gill; Tarun Bhalla; Giorgio Veneziano; Arlyne Thung; Dmitry Tumin; N'Diris Barry; Julie Rice; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Sugammadex to reverse neuromuscular blockade and provide optimal conditions for motor-evoked potential monitoring.

Authors:  Mehdi Trifa; Senthil Krishna; Ajay D'Mello; Mumin Hakim; Joseph Drew Tobias
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.