Literature DB >> 15497032

Hearing AIDS and music.

Marshall Chasin1, Frank A Russo.   

Abstract

Historically, the primary concern for hearing aid design and fitting is optimization for speech inputs. However, increasingly other types of inputs are being investigated and this is certainly the case for music. Whether the hearing aid wearer is a musician or merely someone who likes to listen to music, the electronic and electro-acoustic parameters described can be optimized for music as well as for speech. That is, a hearing aid optimally set for music can be optimally set for speech, even though the converse is not necessarily true. Similarities and differences between speech and music as inputs to a hearing aid are described. Many of these lead to the specification of a set of optimal electro-acoustic characteristics. Parameters such as the peak input-limiting level, compression issues-both compression ratio and knee-points-and number of channels all can deleteriously affect music perception through hearing aids. In other cases, it is not clear how to set other parameters such as noise reduction and feedback control mechanisms. Regardless of the existence of a "music program,'' unless the various electro-acoustic parameters are available in a hearing aid, music fidelity will almost always be less than optimal. There are many unanswered questions and hypotheses in this area. Future research by engineers, researchers, clinicians, and musicians will aid in the clarification of these questions and their ultimate solutions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15497032      PMCID: PMC4111358          DOI: 10.1177/108471380400800202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  14 in total

1.  Vestibular responses to loud dance music: a physiological basis of the "rock and roll threshold"?

Authors:  N P Todd; F W Cody
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Cross-correlation procedures for measuring noise and distortion in AGC hearing aids.

Authors:  J M Kates
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of relative phases on pitch and timbre in the piano bass range.

Authors:  A Galembo; A Askenfelt; L L Cuddy; F A Russo
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Temporal aspects of stimulus-driven attending in dynamic arrays.

Authors:  Mari Riess Jones; Heather Moynihan; Noah MacKenzie; Jennifer Puente
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-07

5.  On using coherence to measure distortion in hearing aids.

Authors:  J M Kates
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Judgments and dimension analyses of perceived sound quality of sound-reproducing systems.

Authors:  A Gabrielsson; U Rosenberg; H Sjögren
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Pitch, consonance, and harmony.

Authors:  E Terhardt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Multidimensional perceptual scaling of musical timbres.

Authors:  J M Grey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  An interval size illusion: the influence of timbre on the perceived size of melodic intervals.

Authors:  Frank A Russo; William Forde Thompson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-05

10.  Acoustic versus electronic modifications of hearing aid low-frequency output.

Authors:  R M Cox; G C Alexander
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1983 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  13 in total

1.  Analog-to-digital conversion to accommodate the dynamics of live music in hearing instruments.

Authors:  Neil S Hockley; Frauke Bahlmann; Bernadette Fulton
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-09

2.  Music Participation Among School-Aged Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.

Authors:  Erik J Jorgensen; Elizabeth A Walker
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 1.493

3.  Multirate Audiometric Filter Bank for Hearing Aid Devices.

Authors:  Alice Sokolova; Dhiman Sengupta; Kuan-Lin Chen; Rajesh Gupta; Baris Aksanli; Fredric Harris; Harinath Garudadri
Journal:  Conf Rec Asilomar Conf Signals Syst Comput       Date:  2021 Oct-Nov

Review 4.  [The professional ear user-implications for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of ear diseases].

Authors:  David Bächinger; Raphael Jecker; Jean-Christoph Hannig; Andreas Werner; Horst Hildebrandt; Michael Eidenbenz; Martin Kompis; Tobias Kleinjung; Dorothe Veraguth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 1.330

5.  The effect of symmetrical and asymmetrical hearing impairment on music quality perception.

Authors:  Yuexin Cai; Fei Zhao; Yuebo Chen; Maojin Liang; Ling Chen; Haidi Yang; Hao Xiong; Xueyuan Zhang; Yiqing Zheng
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  The Hearing-Aid Audio Quality Index (HAAQI).

Authors:  James M Kates; Kathryn H Arehart
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process       Date:  2015-12-10

7.  A preliminary report of music-based training for adult cochlear implant users: Rationales and development.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Emily Guthe; Virginia Driscoll; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2015-09

8.  The effect of visual cues on difficulty ratings for segregation of musical streams in listeners with impaired hearing.

Authors:  Hamish Innes-Brown; Jeremy Marozeau; Peter Blamey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Dynamic Range Across Music Genres and the Perception of Dynamic Compression in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.

Authors:  Martin Kirchberger; Frank A Russo
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 10.  Auditory perceptual efficacy of nonlinear frequency compression used in hearing aids: A review.

Authors:  Yitao Mao; Jing Yang; Emily Hahn; Li Xu
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2017-07-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.