Literature DB >> 15496924

Megabase deletions of gene deserts result in viable mice.

Marcelo A Nóbrega1, Yiwen Zhu, Ingrid Plajzer-Frick, Veena Afzal, Edward M Rubin.   

Abstract

The functional importance of the roughly 98% of mammalian genomes not corresponding to protein coding sequences remains largely undetermined. Here we show that some large-scale deletions of the non-coding DNA referred to as gene deserts can be well tolerated by an organism. We deleted two large non-coding intervals, 1,511 kilobases and 845 kilobases in length, from the mouse genome. Viable mice homozygous for the deletions were generated and were indistinguishable from wild-type littermates with regard to morphology, reproductive fitness, growth, longevity and a variety of parameters assaying general homeostasis. Further detailed analysis of the expression of multiple genes bracketing the deletions revealed only minor expression differences in homozygous deletion and wild-type mice. Together, the two deleted segments harbour 1,243 non-coding sequences conserved between humans and rodents (more than 100 base pairs, 70% identity). Some of the deleted sequences might encode for functions unidentified in our screen; nonetheless, these studies further support the existence of potentially 'disposable DNA' in the genomes of mammals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15496924     DOI: 10.1038/nature03022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  68 in total

1.  Diving through the "-omics": the case for deep phenotyping and systems epidemiology.

Authors:  Robin Haring; Henri Wallaschofski
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2012-02-09

2.  Evolution and functional classification of vertebrate gene deserts.

Authors:  Ivan Ovcharenko; Gabriela G Loots; Marcelo A Nobrega; Ross C Hardison; Webb Miller; Lisa Stubbs
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  18th international mouse genome conference.

Authors:  Amy C Lossie; Thomas P Meehan; Andrew Castillo; Lihua Zheng; Keith C Weiser; Mark A Strivens; Monica J Justice
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 4.  Xenopus as a model system to study transcriptional regulatory networks.

Authors:  Tetsuya Koide; Tadayoshi Hayata; Ken W Y Cho
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Examples of the complex architecture of the human transcriptome revealed by RACE and high-density tiling arrays.

Authors:  Philipp Kapranov; Jorg Drenkow; Jill Cheng; Jeffrey Long; Gregg Helt; Sujit Dike; Thomas R Gingeras
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 6.  Enhancer identification through comparative genomics.

Authors:  Axel Visel; James Bristow; Len A Pennacchio
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 7.727

7.  Widely distributed noncoding purifying selection in the human genome.

Authors:  Saurabh Asthana; William S Noble; Gregory Kryukov; Charles E Grant; Shamil Sunyaev; John A Stamatoyannopoulos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Identifying regulatory elements in eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Leelavati Narlikar; Ivan Ovcharenko
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic       Date:  2009-06-04

9.  Enrichment of mRNA-like noncoding RNAs in the divergence of Drosophila males.

Authors:  Zi-Feng Jiang; Dean A Croshaw; Yan Wang; Jody Hey; Carlos A Machado
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Dispensability of mammalian DNA.

Authors:  Cory McLean; Gill Bejerano
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.