Literature DB >> 15496698

Research in emergency situations: with or without relatives consent.

.   

Abstract

Patients in emergency situations with impaired consciousness are unable to give informed consent to participate in clinical trials. In this situation, some ethics committees ask that consent is obtained from a relative or a legal representative. Others however, waive the need for informed consent and allow the doctor in charge to take responsibility for entering such patients. This study used data from the MRC CRASH Trial, an international randomised controlled trial of corticosteroids in head injury, to assess whether the practice of waiving consent results in earlier administration of the trial treatment. It was found that time from injury to randomisation was significantly reduced (1.2 hours, 95% CI 0.7 to 1.8 hours) and patient recruitment was higher in hospitals where consent was waived compared with those that required relatives consent.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15496698      PMCID: PMC1726499          DOI: 10.1136/emj.2002.004788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  14 in total

1.  Consent for research in hyperacute stroke.

Authors:  Lynne Stobbart; Madeleine J Murtagh; Stephen J Louw; Gary A Ford; Helen Rodgers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-06-17

2.  The inability to consent in critical care research: emergency or impairment of cognitive function?

Authors:  François Lemaire
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Informed consent in emergency research: a contradiction in terms.

Authors:  Malcolm G Booth
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Ethical challenges involved in obtaining consent for research from patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Fiona Ecarnot; Jean-Pierre Quenot; Guillaume Besch; Gaël Piton
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-12

5.  Informed consent in clinical trials in critical care: experience from the PAC-Man Study.

Authors:  Sheila E Harvey; Diana Elbourne; Joanne Ashcroft; Carys M Jones; Kathryn Rowan
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Brief Consent Methods Enable Rapid Enrollment in Acute Stroke Trial: Results From the TICH-2 Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Zhe Kang Law; Jason P Appleton; Polly Scutt; Ian Roberts; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Timothy J England; David J Werring; Thompson Robinson; Kailash Krishnan; Robert A Dineen; Ann Charlotte Laska; Philippe A Lyrer; Juan Jose Egea-Guerrero; Michal Karlinski; Hanne Christensen; Christine Roffe; Daniel Bereczki; Serefnur Ozturk; Jegan Thanabalan; Ronan Collins; Maia Beridze; Alfonso Ciccone; Lelia Duley; Angela Shone; Philip M Bath; Nikola Sprigg
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Emergency research without consent under Polish law.

Authors:  Joanna Rózyńska; Marek Czarkowski
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Paramedic Initiated Lisinopril For Acute Stroke Treatment (PIL-FAST): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Lisa Shaw; Christopher Price; Sally McLure; Denise Howel; Elaine McColl; Gary A Ford
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 9.  [Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions].

Authors:  Spyros D Mentzelopoulos; Keith Couper; Patrick Van de Voorde; Patrick Druwé; Marieke Blom; Gavin D Perkins; Ileana Lulic; Jana Djakow; Violetta Raffay; Gisela Lilja; Leo Bossaert
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 0.826

10.  Update in the treatment of traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Scott E Bell; Roman Hlatky
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.