Literature DB >> 15496667

The effects on place cells of local scopolamine dialysis are mimicked by a mixture of two specific muscarinic antagonists.

Elena Brazhnik1, Ramie Borgnis, Robert U Muller, Steven E Fox.   

Abstract

Using a dialysis probe near CA1 hippocampal recording electrodes, we infused nonspecific (scopolamine) and specific (methoctramine, pirenzepine) antagonists of muscarinic cholinergic transmission to determine their effects on the positional firing properties of place cells. Both low (0.5 mM) and high (2.0 or 3.0 mM) scopolamine significantly decreased in-field firing rate, increased the ratio of out-of-field to in-field rate, and reduced the smoothness of rate maps, while tending to increase out-of-field rate. Thus, local nonspecific muscarinic blockade mimicked the effects seen with intracerebroventricular application, suggesting that blockade of receptors local to the recorded cells plays an essential role. Unexpectedly, dialysis of scopolamine reduced locomotor activity, again duplicating the effects of intracerebroventricular administration. Most effects of methoctramine (1.0 mM), which blocks presynaptic m2 and m4 receptors, were initially strong but then diminished over hours. Methoctramine produced a significant increase only in out/in ratio and out-of-field rate, whereas it tended to increase in-field rate and monotonically decrease smoothness. Pirenzepine (3.0 mM), which blocks postsynaptic m1 receptors, produced a significant increase only in out/in ratio, whereas it tended to increase out-of-field rate and decrease in-field rate; all these effects were monotonic with respect to time. A mixture of methoctramine plus pirenzepine recapitulated the place-cell effects of scopolamine, although neither the mixture nor its separate components affected behavior. We conclude that the effects of scopolamine on place cells likely result from a combination of blockade of postsynaptic m1 receptors, leading to reduced excitability, with blockade of presynaptic m2 and m4 receptors, leading to increased out-of-field firing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15496667      PMCID: PMC6730105          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1618-04.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  16 in total

1.  Cell type-specific dependence of muscarinic signalling in mouse hippocampal stratum oriens interneurones.

Authors:  J Josh Lawrence; Jeffrey M Statland; Zachary M Grinspan; Chris J McBain
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Synergistic effects of genetic variation in nicotinic and muscarinic receptors on visual attention but not working memory.

Authors:  P M Greenwood; M-K Lin; R Sundararajan; K J Fryxell; R Parasuraman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  An inexpensive drivable cannulated microelectrode array for simultaneous unit recording and drug infusion in the same brain nucleus of behaving rats.

Authors:  Johann du Hoffmann; James J Kim; Saleem M Nicola
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Sexually diergic hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis responses to selective and non-selective muscarinic antagonists prior to cholinergic stimulation by physostigmine in rats.

Authors:  Marissa A Smail; Jessica L Soles; Tracy E Karwoski; Robert T Rubin; Michael E Rhodes
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 5.  Excitation-inhibition discoordination in rodent models of mental disorders.

Authors:  André A Fenton
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 13.382

6.  M1 and M4 receptors modulate hippocampal pyramidal neurons.

Authors:  Sameera Dasari; Allan T Gulledge
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The input-output transformation of the hippocampal granule cells: from grid cells to place fields.

Authors:  Licurgo de Almeida; Marco Idiart; John E Lisman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Potential roles of cholinergic modulation in the neural coding of location and movement speed.

Authors:  Holger Dannenberg; James R Hinman; Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2016-09-24

9.  Grid cell spatial tuning reduced following systemic muscarinic receptor blockade.

Authors:  Ehren L Newman; Jason R Climer; Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.899

10.  Evidence for encoding versus retrieval scheduling in the hippocampus by theta phase and acetylcholine.

Authors:  Vincent Douchamps; Ali Jeewajee; Pam Blundell; Neil Burgess; Colin Lever
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.