Literature DB >> 15496485

Auditory-feedback control of temporal call patterns in echolocating horseshoe bats.

Michael Smotherman1, Walter Metzner.   

Abstract

During flight, auditory feedback causes horseshoe bats to adjust the duration and repetition rate of their vocalizations in a context-dependent manner. As these bats approach a target, they make finely graded adjustments in call duration and interpulse interval (IPI), but their echolocation behavior is also characterized by abrupt transitions in overall temporal calling patterns. We investigated the relative contributions of two prominent acoustic cues, echo frequency and delay, toward the control of both graded and transitional changes in call duration and IPI. Echoes returning at frequencies above the emitted call frequency caused bats to switch from long single calls to pairs of short calls (doublets). Alternatively, increasing echo delay caused progressive increases in IPI but caused no accompanying changes in call duration. When frequency shifts were combined with changing echo delays, echo delay altered the IPIs occurring between doublets but not the IPI within a doublet. When the echo mimic was replaced by presentation of either an artificial constant-frequency (CF) stimulus or a frequency-modulated (FM) stimulus, each designed to mimic major components of the echo acoustic structure, we found that CF stimuli could trigger the switch to doublets, but changing CF delay had no influence on IPI, whereas the timing of an FM-sweep presentation had a strong effect on IPI. Because CF and FM sounds are known to be processed separately in the bat auditory system, the results indicate that at least two distinct neural feedback pathways may be used to control the temporal patterns of vocalization in echolocating horseshoe bats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15496485     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00653.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  3 in total

Review 1.  Sensory feedback control of mammalian vocalizations.

Authors:  Michael S Smotherman
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The tiny difference between foraging and communication buzzes uttered by the Mexican free-tailed bat, Tadarida brasiliensis.

Authors:  Christine Schwartz; Jedidiah Tressler; Halli Keller; Marc Vanzant; Sarah Ezell; Michael Smotherman
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Different auditory feedback control for echolocation and communication in horseshoe bats.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Jiang Feng; Walter Metzner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.