Literature DB >> 15496253

Swimming and Campylobacter infections.

Daniela Schönberg-Norio1, Johanna Takkinen, Marja-Liisa Hänninen, Marja-Leena Katila, Suvi-Sirkku Kaukoranta, Leena Mattila, Hilpi Rautelin.   

Abstract

A matched case-control study was conducted to study risk factors for domestically acquired sporadic Campylobacter infections in Finland. Swimming in natural sources of water was a novel risk factor. Eating undercooked meat and drinking dug-well water were also independent risk factors for Campylobacter infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15496253      PMCID: PMC3320392          DOI: 10.3201/eid1008.030924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli are leading causes of human bacterial gastroenteritis in industrialized countries (1,2). In 1998, in Finland, the number of reported Campylobacter cases exceeded that of salmonella for the first time (2). A similar increase in Campylobacter incidence is evident in other industrialized countries (1,3), but the reason for this finding remains unknown (1). Most human Campylobacter infections are sporadic, and a seasonal peak in the distribution of the infections occurs during the summer months in several countries, including Finland (1–4). A variety of risk factors for Campylobacter infections have been identified, including handling and eating poultry (1,3,5–7) and drinking unpasteurized milk (1,3,5,7) or untreated water (1,8,9). In Finland, several waterborne outbreaks have been reported (10), but risks associated with sporadic Campylobacter infections are largely unknown (Table 1).
Table 1

Matched multivariate analysis of significant risk factors for domestically acquired sporadic Campylobacter infection, July–September 2002, Finlanda

Risk factorAdjusted OR95% CI2-tailed p
Tasting or eating raw or undercooked meat10.791.31–89.090.0272
Drinking water from a dug well3.361.37–8.240.0082
Swimming in water from natural sources2.801.23–6.390.0145

aOR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

aOR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. In our case-control study, we identified risk factors for and possible sources of infection for domestically acquired sporadic Campylobacter infections in Finnish patients from three geographic areas during the seasonal peak from July 1 to September 30, 2002.

The Study

Three clinical microbiology laboratories that served patients in the southern, central, and eastern parts of Finland participated in this multicenter, matched case–control study. A case-patient was defined as a person with stool culture, collected during the study period and tested at one of the three laboratories, that was positive for C. jejuni or C. coli. Patients from both outpatient clinics and hospitals were included. When a Campylobacter-positive patient was identified, personnel from the microbiology laboratory contacted the clinic or hospital for more information on the patient's recent travel history. If the patient had not traveled abroad within 2 weeks before illness, that patient's physician was contacted by phone and was asked to send to the patient information about our study and a questionnaire and a prepaid envelope to be returned to the researchers. Two age-, sex-, and municipality-matched controls were chosen for each case-patient. Controls were selected from the Population Register Center, Espoo, Finland, an official register of all Finnish residents. Potential controls were contacted by mail and asked to fill in a questionnaire and mail it back in a prepaid envelope. Exclusion criteria for the controls were Campylobacter infection, at least 3 loose stools per day, abdominal pain, or fever 30 days before filling out the questionnaire. If the questionnaire was not returned within 2 weeks, a new pair of controls was chosen, leading to a maximum of four controls per case. The questionnaire sent to patients included questions on the disease, travel in and outside of Finland, dietary intake of food items (meat, fish, vegetables, fruit, and dairy products), quality of drinking water, contact with pets and other domestic animals, and swimming in water from natural sources. The controls answered similar questions except for those concerning illness. Case-patients and controls were excluded if they had traveled abroad within 2 weeks before illness (case-patients) or filling in the questionnaire (controls). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa. For sample-size calculation, the case-control ratio was 1:2. The exposure level among patients and controls was assumed to be 30% and 15%, respectively. The study was based on the estimate that 97 patients would be needed for the 5% significance level with 80% power. Only patients with at least one matched control were accepted for the final study set. Data entry was performed by EpiData 2.1b (EpiData Association, Odense, Denmark), and statistical analyses were made with EpiInfo 2002 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA). For risk factors with 95% confidence interval (CI) above one, conditional logistic regression examined these independently related to Campylobacter infection. Of the 316 patients with stool culture–verified Campylobacter during the study period, 208 had no known foreign travel; the 634 controls also had not traveled outside of Finland. A total of 151 (73%) patients and 309 (49%) controls returned the questionnaire. Of the patients, 11 were excluded because of traveling abroad (according to the questionnaire), 3 for misunderstanding or missing information, 5 for having too long a delay (>37 days) between onset of symptoms and answering the questionnaire, and 11 because the delay between symptoms and answering the questionnaire could not be defined. In addition, a matched control was unavailable for 21 patients. Of the controls, 172 were excluded for the following reasons: traveling abroad (17 controls), gastrointestinal symptoms (56 controls), missing information (21 controls), and previous Campylobacter infection (2 controls); 76 were omitted because of the lack of a matching case. The final analysis was made up of 100 patients and 137 controls. A total of 99 patients were infected with C. jejuni and 1 with C. coli. All cases were sporadic and not associated with any known outbreaks. Regional distribution and demographic characteristics of patients and controls are presented in Table 2. Patients and controls were matched in doubles (66), triples (31), and quadruples (3). Patients filled in the questionnaires within 3 to 37 days from onset of illness, with a median delay of 16 days. The median interval between onset of illness of the patients and their controls responding to the questionnaire was 32 days. The median delay between patients and controls filling in the questionnaire was 15 days. The total number of exposures analyzed was 82. Factors significantly associated with an increased or a reduced risk for Campylobacter infection are shown in Table 3.
Table 2

Patient characteristics

CharacteristicPatients, N = 100 (%)Controls, N = 137 (%)
Sex
Male42 (42)56 (41)
Female58 (58)81 (59)
Age (y)
1–44 (4)6 (4)
5–91 (1)2 (2)
10–193 (3)5 (4)
20–2913 (13)18 (13)
30–399 (9)13 (10)
40–4915 (15)18 (13)
50–5926 (26)32 (23)
>6029 (29)43 (31)
Median age (y)5151
Municipality
Helsinki35 (35)47 (34)
Kuopio44 (44)62 (45)
Joensuu21 (21)28 (20)
Table 3

Matched univariate analysis of exposure factors for domestically acquired sporadic Campylobacter infection, July–September 2002, Finlanda

Risk factorPatients, n = 100Controls, n = 137Adjusted OR95% CI2-tailed p
Increased risk
Tasting or eating undercooked or raw meatb14/883/12412.001.54–93.770.0052c
Drinking water from a dug well31/9622/1373.191.58–6.450.0017
Swimming in water from natural sources48/10040/1342.271.24–4.160.0089
Eating strawberries70/8979/1242.901.21–6.950.0287
Reduced risk
Consumption of
Black and red currants17/7373/1260.170.07–0.41< 0.0001
Blueberries20/7356/1180.430.21–0.890.0115
Carrots43/8389/1260.440.24–0.820.0039
Yogurt51/9083/1210.350.15–0.850.0332
Pasteurized milk55/9399/1310.440.22–0.850.0075
Cooked or fried fish50/9398/1280.350.18–0.670.0004
Liver (beef)4/6915/1050.180.04–0.870.0083
Drinking water produced by a large water plant52/9788/1370.520.26–1.020.0371
Eating at a friend's house24/4944/710.350.13–0.960.0195
Others
Eating
Minced meat (pork)45/8370/1160.540.28–1.060.0438
Minced meat (beef)64/9097/1280.780.42–1.460.3459
Drinking
Water produced by a small water plant23/9734/1370.800.37–1.720.4528
Water from bedrock well20/9717/1371.960.89–4.340.1210
Bottled water15/9727/1370.750.37–1.510.3062
Contact with cat27/8840/1180.870.43–1.760.5768
Contact with dog53/9376/1281.020.55–1.890.9385
Contact with farm animals4/839/1180.360.06–2.140.1426
Eating outside the home69/98100/1370.780.41–1.480.3686
Eating chicken prepared from
Nonmarinated pieces9/7120/1110.320.10–1.060.0274
Marinated pieces34/8147/1110.760.38–1.580.3613
Nonmarinated strips11/7013/1141.060.33–3.460.8357
Marinated strips19/7740/1180.610.29–1.280.1324
Drinking unpasteurized milk7/809/1111.400.45–4.370.7768

aOR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
bOf 14 exposed patients, 13 specified meat type: 8 (57 %) had tasted undercooked poultry, and 5 (36%) had tasted minced meat.
cFisher exact test.

aOR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
bOf 14 exposed patients, 13 specified meat type: 8 (57 %) had tasted undercooked poultry, and 5 (36%) had tasted minced meat.
cFisher exact test. Of the 14 patients who ate undercooked or raw meat, 57% had eaten poultry and 36% minced meat, supporting previous studies that have identified eating undercooked poultry as a risk factor (7,8,11). Except for tasting or eating undercooked chicken meat, preparing or eating chicken was not associated with an increased risk for Campylobacter infection in our study. Of the four significant risk factors in the initial univariate analysis, three were independently associated with Campylobacter infection in multivariate analysis: tasting or eating undercooked or raw meat, drinking untreated dug well water, and swimming in natural sources of water (Table 1). At least one of these three epidemiologically associated risk factors was found in 67% of the patients.

Conclusions

We identified, to our knowledge for the first time, swimming in natural sources of water to be an independently associated risk factor for sporadic Campylobacter infection. As the infective dose for Campylobacter infection is likely low, contaminated surface water may cause infection through swimming; campylobacters are commonly found in natural waters, such as rivers, streams, and lakes (12). However, in contrast to our study, in a recent Norwegian study (9), swimming in the sea, lakes, and swimming pools was associated with a reduced risk for Campylobacter infection. Our study showed that private water supplies present a significant risk factor for sporadic Campylobacter infection. Kapperud et al. (9) also found that exposure to surface water or drinking nondisinfected water caused an increased risk. In Finland, in addition to the 310,000 households that use private wells, approximately 300,000 summer cottages have private water supplies (13). Dug wells are susceptible to surface water contamination. Furthermore, the summer of 2002 was exceptionally dry in Finland, resulting in poor water quality in these wells because of low groundwater levels. In our study, drinking water from a large water plant protected against sporadic Campylobacter infection. Large water plants usually have surface water as their source and use multistage purification and disinfection procedures before drinking water is distributed to consumers, which substantially reduces risk for waterborne infections. Eating strawberries, although a significant risk factor in univariate analysis, was not an independent risk factor in the multivariate analysis. During the same time period but outside the study region, a small cluster of cases was reported for which the suspected source was eating strawberries directly from the field (14). Reduced risk for the disease was associated with eating other berries, such as red and black currants and blueberries, and carrots. These findings are consistent with the literature (7–9), although no one fully understands the role of these protective factors. In Finland, because most sporadic Campylobacter infections occur during July to September, our study could not identify risk factors that may have varied seasonally. The median age of our patients and controls was considerably high (51 years of age), which may have influenced the results. This age group, however, may be typical for Finland, since in our previous study sporadic, domestically acquired Campylobacter infections were frequent in certain parts of the country in elderly men (15). In addition to the known risk factor of eating raw or undercooked meat, this study clearly identified water as an important risk for domestically acquired Campylobacter infections in the summertime in Finland. The novel finding that swimming in water from natural sources was associated with increased risk for infection further emphasizes the importance of other water-related exposure factors.
  12 in total

Review 1.  Campylobacters in water, sewage and the environment.

Authors:  K Jones
Journal:  Symp Ser Soc Appl Microbiol       Date:  2001

2.  Factors associated with increased and decreased risk of Campylobacter infection: a prospective case-control study in Norway.

Authors:  Georg Kapperud; Gyrid Espeland; Erik Wahl; Anna Walde; Hallgeir Herikstad; Stein Gustavsen; Ingvar Tveit; Olav Natås; Lars Bevanger; Asbjørn Digranes
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Risk factors for sporadic Campylobacter infections: results of a case-control study in southeastern Norway.

Authors:  G Kapperud; E Skjerve; N H Bean; S M Ostroff; J Lassen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Detection and typing of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli and analysis of indicator organisms in three waterborne outbreaks in Finland.

Authors:  Marja-Liisa Hänninen; H Haajanen; T Pummi; K Wermundsen; M-L Katila; H Sarkkinen; I Miettinen; H Rautelin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Risk factors for indigenous campylobacter infection: a Swedish case-control study.

Authors:  A Studahl; Y Andersson
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.451

6.  Campylobacteriosis in New Zealand: results of a case-control study.

Authors:  J Eberhart-Phillips; N Walker; N Garrett; D Bell; D Sinclair; W Rainger; M Bates
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 7.  Campylobacters: the most common bacterial enteropathogens in the Nordic countries.

Authors:  H Rautelin; M L Hänninen
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.709

8.  A campylobacter outbreak associated with stir-fried food.

Authors:  M R Evans; W Lane; J A Frost; G Nylen
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.451

9.  The seasonal distribution of campylobacter infection in nine European countries and New Zealand.

Authors:  G Nylen; F Dunstan; S R Palmer; Y Andersson; F Bager; J Cowden; G Feierl; Y Galloway; G Kapperud; F Megraud; K Molbak; L R Petersen; P Ruutu
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.451

10.  Domestically acquired Campylobacter infections in Finland.

Authors:  Antti Vierikko; Marja-Liisa Hänninen; Anja Siitonen; Petri Ruutu; Hilpi Rautelin
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  52 in total

1.  Association of Campylobacter jejuni metabolic traits with multilocus sequence types.

Authors:  Caroline P A de Haan; Ann-Katrin Llarena; Joana Revez; Marja-Liisa Hänninen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Case-control studies of sporadic enteric infections: a review and discussion of studies conducted internationally from 1990 to 2009.

Authors:  Kathleen E Fullerton; Elaine Scallan; Martyn D Kirk; Barbara E Mahon; Frederick J Angulo; Henriette de Valk; Wilfrid van Pelt; Charmaine Gauci; Anja M Hauri; Shannon Majowicz; Sarah J O'Brien
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.171

3.  Decreasing trend of overlapping multilocus sequence types between human and chicken Campylobacter jejuni isolates over a decade in Finland.

Authors:  C P A de Haan; R Kivistö; M Hakkinen; H Rautelin; M L Hänninen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Association of Campylobacter jejuni Cj0859c gene (fspA) variants with different C. jejuni multilocus sequence types.

Authors:  C P A de Haan; R Kivistö; M L Hänninen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Evaluation of genetic markers and molecular typing methods for prediction of sources of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli infections.

Authors:  Rauni Kärenlampi; Hilpi Rautelin; Marja-Liisa Hänninen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Demographic determinants for Campylobacter infection in England and Wales: implications for future epidemiological studies.

Authors:  I A Gillespie; S J O'Brien; C Penman; D Tompkins; J Cowden; T J Humphrey
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.451

7.  A multi-centre prospective case-control study of campylobacter infection in persons aged 5 years and older in Australia.

Authors:  Cameron Moffatt
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 2.451

Review 8.  The Data Behind Risk Analysis of Campylobacter Jejuni and Campylobacter Coli Infections.

Authors:  Racem Ben Romdhane; Roswitha Merle
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

9.  Risk factors for infection with Campylobacter jejuni flaA genotypes.

Authors:  L E Unicomb; L C O'Reilly; M D Kirk; R J Stafford; H V Smith; N G Becker; M S Patel; G L Gilbert
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2008-01-21       Impact factor: 2.451

10.  Campylobacter excreted into the environment by animal sources: prevalence, concentration shed, and host association.

Authors:  Iain D Ogden; John F Dallas; Marion MacRae; Ovidiu Rotariu; Kenny W Reay; Malcolm Leitch; Ann P Thomson; Samuel K Sheppard; Martin Maiden; Ken J Forbes; Norval J C Strachan
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.171

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.