Literature DB >> 1549019

The accuracy of the ACSM cycle ergometry equation.

P B Lang1, R W Latin, K E Berg, M B Mellion.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of the American College of Sports Medicine's equation for estimating the oxygen cost of exercise performed on a cycle ergometer. Sixty healthy males, ages 19-39 yr old, performed a five stage (30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 W) submaximal cycle ergometer test while their oxygen uptake was measured. Results indicated the standard error of estimate for the predicted oxygen values ranged from 0.11 to 0.22 l.min-1, with correlations between the actual and predicted values ranging from r = 0.22 to r = 0.50. Total errors ranged from 0.23 to 0.31 l.min-1. The actual oxygen cost was underestimated from 0.16 to 0.29 l.min-1 (P less than 0.05) by the equation at each workload. A revised equation was developed based upon the actual VO2-power relationship. The resulting slope was lower and the intercept higher when compared with the current ACSM equation. The slope and intercept of the revised equation are more consistent with values published in the literature. This equation appears as: VO2 (ml.min-1) = kgm.min-1 x 1.9 ml.min-1) + ((3.5 ml.kg-1.min-1 x kg body weight) + 260 ml.min-1). Predicted values from the revised equation were more accurate as reflected by slightly higher correlations, lower total errors, and lower mean differences from actual VO2 measurements than those from the current equation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1549019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  9 in total

Review 1.  Energy cost calculations for exercise prescription: an update.

Authors:  D P Swain
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Effect of exercise to rest ratio on plasma lactate concentration at work rates above and below maximum oxygen uptake.

Authors:  D L Ballor; A J Volovsek
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992

3.  Do the speeds defined by the American College of Sports Medicine metabolic equation for running produce target energy expenditures during isocaloric exercise bouts?

Authors:  Felipe A Cunha; Robert P G Catalão; Adrian W Midgley; Jonas Gurgel; Flávia Porto; Paulo T V Farinatti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Validation of an equation for predicting energy cost of arm ergometry in women.

Authors:  Swapan Mookerjee; Cynthia Surmacz; Margaret Till; Brandy Weller
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Validity of a Newly-Designed Rectilinear Stepping Ergometer Submaximal Exercise Test to Assess Cardiorespiratory Fitness.

Authors:  Rubin Zhang; Likui Zhan; Shaoming Sun; Wei Peng; Yining Sun
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Influence of age in estimating maximal oxygen uptake.

Authors:  Christina G de Souza E Silva; Barry A Franklin; Daniel E Forman; Claudio Gil S Araújo
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.327

7.  Pedaling rate is an important determinant of human oxygen uptake during exercise on the cycle ergometer.

Authors:  Federico Formenti; Alberto E Minetti; Fabio Borrani
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2015-09

8.  Influence of central obesity in estimating maximal oxygen uptake.

Authors:  Christina Grüne de Souza E Silva; Barry A Franklin; Claudio Gil Soares de Araújo
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.365

9.  Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry.

Authors:  Christina G de Souza e Silva; Claudio Gil S Araújo
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 2.000

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.