Literature DB >> 15489207

Fecal water genotoxicity is predictive of tumor-preventive activities by inulin-like oligofructoses, probiotics (Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Bifidobacterium lactis), and their synbiotic combination.

Annett Klinder1, Antje Förster, Giovanna Caderni, Angelo Pietro Femia, Beatrice L Pool-Zobel.   

Abstract

The measurement of fecal water genotoxicity in human colon cells could be a useful biomarker to study effects of diet in the colon. Here we assessed aqueous fecal extracts of samples from a chronic study with rats fed prebiotics, probiotics, and their combination. Treatments were maltodextrins (controls), inulin/oligofructoses (prebiotic), Lactobacillus rhamnosus, and Bifidobacterium lactis (probiotics) or both (synbiotic). Azoxymethane (AOM) was administered to initiate tumors. Rat feces were collected at 0 and 10 days and 2, 4, and 8 mo, and cecal contents were collected at 8 mo. Aqueous phases were prepared and tested for genotoxicity in HT29 colon cells using the comet assay. The studied types of intervention reduced fecal and cecal genotoxicity. DNA damage by samples from AOM-treated, tumor-free rats was significantly lower than from tumor-bearing animals, especially after 4 mo of synbiotic and prebiotic interventions. Inulin-based diets reduced exposure to genotoxins in the feces, directly reflecting the reported reduction of tumor incidence in these animals. Evidence is provided for the validity of this measurement as a biomarker of chemoprevention because 1) fecal water genotoxicity reflected genotoxic exposure in the cecum, 2) tumor incidence and fecal genotoxicity were directly related, and 3) these interventions reduced tumor risks by reducing exposure to genotoxins in the gut.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15489207     DOI: 10.1207/s15327914nc4902_5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Cancer        ISSN: 0163-5581            Impact factor:   2.900


  16 in total

Review 1.  Intestinal microbiome and lymphoma development.

Authors:  Mitsuko L Yamamoto; Robert H Schiestl
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

2.  Gut microbial differences in breast and prostate cancer cases from two randomised controlled trials compared to matched cancer-free controls.

Authors:  K S Smith; A D Frugé; W van der Pol; N E Caston; C D Morrow; W Demark-Wahnefried; T L Carson
Journal:  Benef Microbes       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.205

3.  An unsuitable and degraded diet? Part three: Victorian consumption patterns and their health benefits.

Authors:  Judith Rowbotham; Paul Clayton
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Effect of Prebiotic Galacto-Oligosaccharides on Serum Lipid Profile of Hypercholesterolemics.

Authors:  Arooj Hashmi; Naureen Naeem; Zubair Farooq; Saima Masood; Sanaullah Iqbal; Rahat Naseer
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 5.  Prebiotics: tools to manipulate the gut microbiome and metabolome.

Authors:  Fatima Enam; Thomas J Mansell
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 6.  New approaches for bacteriotherapy: prebiotics, new-generation probiotics, and synbiotics.

Authors:  Rachna Patel; Herbert L DuPont
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Associations between dietary habits and body mass index with gut microbiota composition and fecal water genotoxicity: an observational study in African American and Caucasian American volunteers.

Authors:  Volker Mai; Quintece M McCrary; Rashmi Sinha; Michael Glei
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 8.  Cholesterol-lowering effects of probiotics and prebiotics: a review of in vivo and in vitro findings.

Authors:  Lay-Gaik Ooi; Min-Tze Liong
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  The gut microbiota and obesity: from correlation to causality.

Authors:  Liping Zhao
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 60.633

10.  Intervention with cloudy apple juice results in altered biological activities of ileostomy samples collected from individual volunteers.

Authors:  Selvaraju Veeriah; Kamal Kumar Balavenkatraman; Frank- D Böhmer; Kathrin Kahle; Michael Glei; Elke Richling; Wolfgang Scheppach; Beatrice L Pool-Zobel
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 5.614

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.