Literature DB >> 15488499

Improving the standard of operation notes in orthopaedic and trauma surgery: the value of a proforma.

H Al Hussainy1, F Ali, S Jones, J C McGregor-Riley, S Sukumar.   

Abstract

Comprehensive documentation of surgical procedures is an essential component of good medical practice, but the standard of operation notes in orthopaedic and trauma surgery has been notoriously poor. The value of proformas in the production of high standard operation notes has been demonstrated in various surgical specialities. We have compared the standard of documentation of operation notes before and after the introduction of a proforma and report a significant improvement (P < 0.001) with the proforma. In addition, the results from a neighbouring hospital where a similar proforma was in use show a sustained standard of documentation 5 years after it was first used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15488499     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2003.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  15 in total

1.  Improving the Quality of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical Notes in an Indian Public Sector Hospital in Accordance with the Royal College of Surgeons Guidelines: A Completed Audit Loop Study.

Authors:  B Krishnan; G Arun Prasad; B Madhan
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-10-28

2.  An assessment of the quality of clinical records in elective orthopaedics using the STAR score.

Authors:  Lava Chalikonda; Nigel Phelan; John O'Byrne
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Improving the Standard of Operative Notes within an Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, using an Operative Note Proforma.

Authors:  Karl Payne; Keith Jones; Andrew Dickenson
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-05-06

4.  Improving the quality of procedure-specific operation reports in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Andrew W Barritt; Laura Clark; Adam M M Cohen; Naveen Hosangadi-Jayedev; Paul A Gibb
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 5.  Establishing the evidence base for trauma quality improvement: a collaborative WHO-IATSIC review.

Authors:  Catherine J Juillard; Charles Mock; Jacques Goosen; Manjul Joshipura; Ian Civil
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Evaluation of operative notes concerning laparoscopic cholecystectomy: are standards being met?

Authors:  Linda S G L Wauben; Richard H M Goossens; Johan F Lange
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  The ANKLe score: an audit of otolaryngology emergency clinic record keeping.

Authors:  Sara C Dexter; Daichi Hayashi; James R Tysome
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Audit of Orthopaedic Surgical Documentation.

Authors:  Fionn Coughlan; Prasad Ellanti; Cliodhna Ní Fhoghlu; Andrew Moriarity; Niall Hogan
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2015-08-19

9.  The STAR score: a method for auditing clinical records.

Authors:  H Tuffaha; T Amer; P Jayia; C Bicknell; N Rajaretnam; P Ziprin
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Assessing the quality of operation notes: a review of 1092 operation notes in 9 UK hospitals.

Authors:  Julia Blackburn
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2016-02-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.