Larry D Lynd1, Bernie J O'brien. 1. Centre For Evaluation of Medicines, St. Joseph's Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. lyndl@mcmaster.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the use of probabilistic simulation modeling to estimate the joint density of therapeutic risks and benefits. Published data are used to introduce the risk-benefit acceptability curve as a novel method of illustrating risk-benefit analysis. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Using published data, we performed a second-order Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the joint density of major bleeding and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) secondary to enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin. Within a Bayesian framework, beta-distributions for the probabilities of experiencing a DVT and major bleed were derived from the clinical trial, and incremental probabilities were calculated. RESULTS: The incremental risk-benefit pairs from 3,000 simulations are presented on a risk-benefit plane. To accommodate different risk preferences, the results are also illustrated using a risk-benefit acceptability curve, which incorporates different risk-benefit acceptability thresholds (mu), or the number of major bleeds one is willing to accept in order to avert one DVT. Finally, a net-benefit curve is used to illustrate the risk-benefit ratio and the derivation of 95% confidence intervals around the ratio. CONCLUSION: Modern simulation methods permit the estimation of the joint density of risks and benefits with their associated uncertainty, and within a Bayesian framework, facilitate the estimation of the probability that a therapy is net-beneficial over different preference thresholds for risk-benefit trade-offs.
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the use of probabilistic simulation modeling to estimate the joint density of therapeutic risks and benefits. Published data are used to introduce the risk-benefit acceptability curve as a novel method of illustrating risk-benefit analysis. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Using published data, we performed a second-order Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the joint density of major bleeding and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) secondary to enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin. Within a Bayesian framework, beta-distributions for the probabilities of experiencing a DVT and major bleed were derived from the clinical trial, and incremental probabilities were calculated. RESULTS: The incremental risk-benefit pairs from 3,000 simulations are presented on a risk-benefit plane. To accommodate different risk preferences, the results are also illustrated using a risk-benefit acceptability curve, which incorporates different risk-benefit acceptability thresholds (mu), or the number of major bleeds one is willing to accept in order to avert one DVT. Finally, a net-benefit curve is used to illustrate the risk-benefit ratio and the derivation of 95% confidence intervals around the ratio. CONCLUSION: Modern simulation methods permit the estimation of the joint density of risks and benefits with their associated uncertainty, and within a Bayesian framework, facilitate the estimation of the probability that a therapy is net-beneficial over different preference thresholds for risk-benefit trade-offs.
Authors: Taewoo Lee; Andrea K Biddle; Sofia Lionaki; Vimal K Derebail; Sean J Barbour; Sameer Tannous; Michelle A Hladunewich; Yichun Hu; Caroline J Poulton; Shannon L Mahoney; J Charles Jennette; Susan L Hogan; Ronald J Falk; Daniel C Cattran; Heather N Reich; Patrick H Nachman Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Jerome J Federspiel; Sally C Stearns; Ron T van Domburg; Brett C Sheridan; Jennifer L Lund; Patrick W Serruys Journal: EuroIntervention Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 6.534
Authors: Alejandro Lazo-Langner; Marc A Rodger; Nicholas J Barrowman; Tim Ramsay; Philip S Wells; Douglas A Coyle Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2012-01-10 Impact factor: 4.615