Literature DB >> 15485731

Advances in risk-benefit evaluation using probabilistic simulation methods: an application to the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis.

Larry D Lynd1, Bernie J O'brien.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the use of probabilistic simulation modeling to estimate the joint density of therapeutic risks and benefits. Published data are used to introduce the risk-benefit acceptability curve as a novel method of illustrating risk-benefit analysis. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: Using published data, we performed a second-order Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the joint density of major bleeding and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) secondary to enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin. Within a Bayesian framework, beta-distributions for the probabilities of experiencing a DVT and major bleed were derived from the clinical trial, and incremental probabilities were calculated.
RESULTS: The incremental risk-benefit pairs from 3,000 simulations are presented on a risk-benefit plane. To accommodate different risk preferences, the results are also illustrated using a risk-benefit acceptability curve, which incorporates different risk-benefit acceptability thresholds (mu), or the number of major bleeds one is willing to accept in order to avert one DVT. Finally, a net-benefit curve is used to illustrate the risk-benefit ratio and the derivation of 95% confidence intervals around the ratio.
CONCLUSION: Modern simulation methods permit the estimation of the joint density of risks and benefits with their associated uncertainty, and within a Bayesian framework, facilitate the estimation of the probability that a therapy is net-beneficial over different preference thresholds for risk-benefit trade-offs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15485731     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  9 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacoeconomics and pharmacoepidemiology: curious bedfellows or a match made in heaven?

Authors:  Andrew H Briggs; Adrian R Levy
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Effect of the Fukushima nuclear accident on the risk perception of residents near a nuclear power plant in China.

Authors:  Lei Huang; Ying Zhou; Yuting Han; James K Hammitt; Jun Bi; Yang Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Integration of PKPD relationships into benefit-risk analysis.

Authors:  Francesco Bellanti; Rob C van Wijk; Meindert Danhof; Oscar Della Pasqua
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Personalized prophylactic anticoagulation decision analysis in patients with membranous nephropathy.

Authors:  Taewoo Lee; Andrea K Biddle; Sofia Lionaki; Vimal K Derebail; Sean J Barbour; Sameer Tannous; Michelle A Hladunewich; Yichun Hu; Caroline J Poulton; Shannon L Mahoney; J Charles Jennette; Susan L Hogan; Ronald J Falk; Daniel C Cattran; Heather N Reich; Patrick H Nachman
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 10.612

5.  Risk-benefit trade-offs in revascularisation choices.

Authors:  Jerome J Federspiel; Sally C Stearns; Ron T van Domburg; Brett C Sheridan; Jennifer L Lund; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.534

6.  Value Assessment and Quantitative Benefit-Risk Modelling of Biosimilar Infliximab for Crohn's Disease.

Authors:  Heather Catt; Keith Bodger; Jamie J Kirkham; Dyfrig A Hughes
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  A framework for organizing and selecting quantitative approaches for benefit-harm assessment.

Authors:  Milo A Puhan; Sonal Singh; Carlos O Weiss; Ravi Varadhan; Cynthia M Boyd
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Comparing multiple competing interventions in the absence of randomized trials using clinical risk-benefit analysis.

Authors:  Alejandro Lazo-Langner; Marc A Rodger; Nicholas J Barrowman; Tim Ramsay; Philip S Wells; Douglas A Coyle
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 9.  Anti-thrombotic strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI.

Authors:  Andreas Schäfer; Ulrike Flierl; Johann Bauersachs
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 5.460

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.