Literature DB >> 1548535

The value of sputum cytology.

B MacDougall1, B Weinerman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of cytologic examination of expectorated sputum in the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected lung cancer.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
SETTING: Inpatient wards, tertiary care university hospital.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The charts of 357 patients were reviewed. Two hundred eighty-eight of the 357 patients had had initial sputum cytologic examination prior to other diagnostic procedures, of which 41 (15%) had positive cytologic results. Thirty-six of the 41 were confirmed histologically or shown to have metastatic spread by noninvasive tests. Of the 222 patients with negative or unsatisfactory sputum tests, 97 went on to bronchoscopy and 35 had needle-aspiration biopsies. In the population of patients whose chest x-rays were highly suggestive of primary or metastatic lung cancer, the positive rate for cytologic examination was 38/94 (40%). There was no false-positive test in this study. Of the 50 patients with positive cytologic results, five (10%) had diseases that were of a different cell type; two of these five (40%) had diseases that involved small-cell cancer. There was an unsatisfactory delay in obtaining these samples for analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Sputum cytology was found to be too insensitive and insufficiently accurate to be included in the routine workup of a patient suspected of having lung cancer. The results of the test did not influence further diagnostic procedures. This test should, therefore, be reserved for patients considered on initial assessment to be too sick for further investigations and treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1548535     DOI: 10.1007/bf02599093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  9 in total

1.  Bronchial brushing during fiberoptic bronchoscopy for the cytodiagnosis of lung cancer: comparison with sputum and bronchial washings.

Authors:  C W Bedrossian; D L Rybka
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1976 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.319

2.  Fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of lung cancer comparison of pre-and post-bronchoscopy sputa, washings, bruchings and biopsies.

Authors:  S K Chopra; M G Genovesi; D H Simmons; B Gothe
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1977 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.319

3.  Cytology in diagnosis of cancer affecting the lung. Results in 1,000 consecutive patients.

Authors:  U W Rosa; J C Prolla; E da S Gastal
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Sputum cytology for the diagnosis of carcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  S Pilotti; F Rilke; G Gribaudi; G L Ravasi
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1982 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.319

Review 5.  The diagnostic reliability of cytologic typing in primary lung cancer with a review of the literature.

Authors:  H Suprun; G Pedio; J R Ruttner
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1980 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.319

6.  Sputum cytology in the management of patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  P J Savage; W N Donovan; R P Dellinger
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 0.954

7.  Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of pulmonary cytology: comparison of techniques used in conjunction with flexible fiber optic bronchoscopy.

Authors:  S J Jay; K Wehr; D P Nicholson; A L Smith
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1980 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.319

8.  Cytologic and histologic correlation in primary lung cancer. A study of 154 cases with resectable tumors.

Authors:  T Tanaka; M Yamamoto; T Tamura; Y Moritani; M Miyai; S Hiraki; T Ohnoshi; I Kimura
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.319

9.  Factors significant in the diagnostic accuracy of lung cytology in bronchial washing and sputum samples. II. Sputum samples.

Authors:  A B Ng; G C Horak
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1983 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.319

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.