Literature DB >> 15484868

Transitive responding in hooded crows requires linearly ordered stimuli.

Olga F Lazareva1, Anna A Smirnova, Maria S Bagozkaja, Zoya A Zorina, Vladimir V Rayevsky, Edward A Wasserman.   

Abstract

Eight crows were taught to discriminate overlapping pairs of visual stimuli (A+ B-, B+ C-, C+ D-, and D+ E-). For 4 birds, the stimuli were colored cards with a circle of the same color on the reverse side whose diameter decreased from A to E (ordered feedback group). These circles were made available for comparison to potentially help the crows order the stimuli along a physical dimension. For the other 4 birds, the circles corresponding to the colored cards had the same diameter (constant feedback group). In later testing, a novel choice pair (BD) was presented. Reinforcement history involving stimuli B and D was controlled so that the reinforcement/nonreinforcement ratios for the latter would be greater than for the former. If, during the BD test, the crows chose between stimuli according to these reinforcement/nonreinforcement ratios, then they should prefer D; if they chose according to the diameter of the feedback stimuli, then they should prefer B. In the ordered feedback group, the crows strongly preferred B over D; in the constant feedback group, the crows' choice did not differ significantly from chance. These results, plus simulations using associative models, suggest that the orderability of the postchoice feedback stimuli is important for crows' transitive responding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15484868      PMCID: PMC1284988          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2004.82-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  12 in total

1.  Use of number by crows: investigation by matching and oddity learning.

Authors:  A A Smirnova; O F Lazareva; Z A Zorina
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Learning and memory for hierarchical relationships in the monkey: effects of aging.

Authors:  P R Rapp; M T Kansky; H Eichenbaum
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Capacity of birds for transitive inference: the solution of the Gillan test by corvids and pigeons.

Authors:  Z A Zorina; T S Kalinina; N V Markina
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  1996 Sep-Dec

4.  Transitive inferences and memory in young children.

Authors:  P E Bryant; T Trabasso
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1971-08-13       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Are monkeys logical?

Authors:  B O McGonigle; M Chalmers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1977-06-23       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  A comparative study of geometric rule learning by nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana), pigeons (Columba livia), and jackdaws (Corvus monedula).

Authors:  Juli E Jones; Elena Antoniadis; Sara J Shettleworth; Alan C Kamil
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  A field study of the sociobiology of rhesus monkeys, Macaca mulatta.

Authors:  S A ALTMANN
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1962-12-28       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Transitive inference in rats (Rattus norvegicus).

Authors:  H Davis
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Conservation of hippocampal memory function in rats and humans.

Authors:  M Bunsey; H Eichenbaum
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Processing of ordinality and transitivity by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  S T Boysen; G G Berntson; T A Shreyer; K S Quigley
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.231

View more
  15 in total

1.  The human ventromedial prefrontal cortex is critical for transitive inference.

Authors:  Timothy R Koscik; Daniel Tranel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Mechanisms of inferential order judgments in humans (Homo sapiens) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Dustin J Merritt; Herbert S Terrace
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.231

3.  The transformation of consequential functions in accordance with the relational frames of more-than and less-than.

Authors:  Robert Whelan; Dermot Barnes-Holmes; Simon Dymond
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Six-term transitive inference with pigeons: successive-pair training followed by mixed-pair training.

Authors:  Carter W Daniels; Jennifer R Laude; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 5.  On aims and methods in the neuroimaging of derived relations.

Authors:  David W Dickins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Effects of spatial training on transitive inference performance in humans and rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Regina Paxton Gazes; Olga F Lazareva; Clara N Bergene; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 2.478

7.  Cognitive mechanisms for transitive inference performance in rhesus monkeys: measuring the influence of associative strength and inferred order.

Authors:  Regina Paxton Gazes; Nicholas W Chee; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2012-10

8.  Automated cognitive testing of monkeys in social groups yields results comparable to individual laboratory-based testing.

Authors:  Regina Paxton Gazes; Emily Kathryn Brown; Benjamin M Basile; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Associative models fail to characterize transitive inference performance in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Olga F Lazareva; Regina Paxton Gazes; Zachary Elkins; Robert Hampton
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  A comparative analysis of serial ordering in ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta).

Authors:  Dustin Merritt; Evan L Maclean; Sarah Jaffe; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.231

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.