Literature DB >> 15484667

Clinical applications of electrical stimulation after spinal cord injury.

Graham H Creasey1, Chester H Ho, Ronald J Triolo, David R Gater, Anthony F DiMarco, Kath M Bogie, Michael W Keith.   

Abstract

During the last one-half century, electrical stimulation has become clinically significant for improving health and restoring useful function after spinal cord injury. Short-term stimulation can be provided by electrodes on the skin or percutaneous fine wires, but implanted systems are preferable for long-term use. Electrical stimulation of intact lower motor neurons can exercise paralyzed muscles and reverse wasting; improve strength, endurance, and cardiovascular fitness; and may reduce the progression of osteoporosis. Other potential therapeutic uses being investigated include reduction of spasticity, prevention of deep vein thrombosis, and improvement of tissue health. Pacing of intact phrenic nerves in high tetraplegia can produce effective respiration without mechanical ventilation, allowing improved speech, increased mobility, and increased sense of well-being. Improvement of cough has also been demonstrated. Stimulation of intact sacral nerves can produce effective micturition and reduce urinary tract infection; it can also improve bowel function and erection. It is usually combined with posterior sacral rhizotomy to improve continence and bladder capacity, and the combination has been shown to reduce costs of care. Electroejaculation can now produce semen in most men with spinal cord injury. Significant achievements have also been made in restoring limb function. Useful hand grasp can be provided in C5 and C6 tetraplegia, reducing dependence on adapted equipment and assistants. Standing, assistance with transfers, and walking for short distances can be provided to selected persons with paraplegia, improving their access to objects, places, and opportunities that are inaccessible from a wheelchair. This review summarizes the current state of therapeutic and neuroprosthetic applications of electrical stimulation after spinal cord injury and identifies some future directions of research and clinical and commercial development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15484667     DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2004.11753774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med        ISSN: 1079-0268            Impact factor:   1.985


  22 in total

Review 1.  Spinal neurons exhibit a surprising capacity to learn and a hidden vulnerability when freed from the brain's control.

Authors:  James W Grau; Michelle A Hook
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Feasibility of a hybrid-FES system for gait restoration in paraplegics.

Authors:  Hugo A Quintero; Ryan J Farris; William K Durfee; Michael Goldfarb
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2010

Review 3.  Functional electrical stimulation and spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Chester H Ho; Ronald J Triolo; Anastasia L Elias; Kevin L Kilgore; Anthony F DiMarco; Kath Bogie; Albert H Vette; Musa L Audu; Rudi Kobetic; Sarah R Chang; K Ming Chan; Sean Dukelow; Dennis J Bourbeau; Steven W Brose; Kenneth J Gustafson; Zelma H T Kiss; Vivian K Mushahwar
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.784

Review 4.  Neurorobotic and hybrid management of lower limb motor disorders: a review.

Authors:  Juan C Moreno; Antonio J Del Ama; Ana de Los Reyes-Guzmán; Angel Gil-Agudo; Ramón Ceres; José L Pons
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 5.  The effects of electrical stimulation on body composition and metabolic profile after spinal cord injury--Part II.

Authors:  Ashraf S Gorgey; David R Dolbow; James D Dolbow; Refka K Khalil; David R Gater
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 6.  Enhancing neural activity to drive respiratory plasticity following cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Kristiina M Hormigo; Lyandysha V Zholudeva; Victoria M Spruance; Vitaliy Marchenko; Marie-Pascale Cote; Stephane Vinit; Simon Giszter; Tatiana Bezdudnaya; Michael A Lane
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 5.330

7.  BDNF and learning: Evidence that instrumental training promotes learning within the spinal cord by up-regulating BDNF expression.

Authors:  F Gómez-Pinilla; J R Huie; Z Ying; A R Ferguson; E D Crown; K M Baumbauer; V R Edgerton; J W Grau
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  The effectiveness of progressively increasing stimulation frequency and intensity to maintain paralyzed muscle force during repetitive activation in persons with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Li-Wei Chou; Samuel C Lee; Therese E Johnston; Stuart A Binder-Macleod
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Chronic stability and selectivity of four-contact spiral nerve-cuff electrodes in stimulating the human femoral nerve.

Authors:  L E Fisher; D J Tyler; J S Anderson; R J Triolo
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Intraspinal microstimulation produces over-ground walking in anesthetized cats.

Authors:  B J Holinski; K A Mazurek; D G Everaert; A Toossi; A M Lucas-Osma; P Troyk; R Etienne-Cummings; R B Stein; V K Mushahwar
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.