Literature DB >> 15483806

Knee-simulator testing of conventional and cross-linked polyethylene tibial inserts.

Orhun K Muratoglu1, Charles R Bragdon, Murali Jasty, Daniel O O'Connor, Rebecca S Von Knoch, William H Harris.   

Abstract

We compared the resistance to delamination and to adhesive/abrasive wear of conventional and highly cross-linked polyethylene tibial inserts of a cruciate-retaining total knee design using a knee simulator. Both groups were tested after aggressive, accelerated aging, and 1 set of conventional inserts was studied without aging. Aging oxidized the conventional, but not the highly cross-linked, inserts. The simulated normal gait testing lasted for 5 and 10 million cycles for the conventional and highly cross-linked inserts, respectively. Aged conventional inserts showed delaminations, whereas none were observed in the unaged conventional and aged cross-linked inserts. Wear rates measured by the gravimetric method were 9 +/- 2 mm3, 10 +/- 4 mm3, and 1 +/- 0 mm3 per million cycles; by the metrologic method, they were 8 +/- 1 mm3, 9 +/- 2 mm3, and 3 +/- 0 mm3 for the unaged conventional, aged conventional, and aged highly crosslinked inserts, respectively. In the test model used, oxidation led to delamination, whereas increased cross-link density resulted in reduced adhesive/abrasive wear of tibial inserts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15483806     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  16 in total

1.  Implant design influences tibial post wear damage in posterior-stabilized knees.

Authors:  Mark M Dolan; Natalie H Kelly; Joseph T Nguyen; Timothy M Wright; Steven B Haas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  How do CAD models compare with reverse engineered manufactured components for use in wear analysis?

Authors:  Matthew G Teeter; Douglas D R Naudie; Robert B Bourne; David W Holdsworth
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Highly crosslinked polyethylene is safe for use in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Hodrick; Erik P Severson; Deborah S McAlister; Brian Dahl; Aaron A Hofmann
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  [Current role of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis].

Authors:  T Kappe; M Flören; R Bieger; H Reichel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Experimental testing of total knee replacements with UHMW-PE inserts: impact of severe wear test conditions.

Authors:  Carmen Zietz; Joern Reinders; Jens Schwiesau; Alexander Paulus; Jan Philippe Kretzer; Thomas Grupp; Sandra Utzschneider; Rainer Bader
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Is there a difference in total knee arthroplasty risk of revision in highly crosslinked versus conventional polyethylene?

Authors:  Elizabeth W Paxton; Maria C S Inacio; Steven Kurtz; Rebecca Love; Guy Cafri; Robert S Namba
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Metal-on-conventional polyethylene total hip arthroplasty bearing surfaces have a higher risk of revision than metal-on-highly crosslinked polyethylene: results from a US registry.

Authors:  Elizabeth W Paxton; Maria C S Inacio; Robert S Namba; Rebecca Love; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Can microcomputed tomography measure retrieved polyethylene wear? Comparing fixed-bearing and rotating-platform knees.

Authors:  Charles A Engh; Rebecca L Zimmerman; Robert H Hopper; Gerard A Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Is There a Benefit to Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene in Posterior-stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Elizabeth S Soileau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Effect of cross-link density on the high pressure crystallization of UHMWPE.

Authors:  Ebru Oral; Christine Godleski-Beckos; Bassem W Ghali; Andrew J Lozynsky; Orhun K Muratoglu
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.368

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.