PURPOSE: The unique immunoglobulin idiotype (Id) expressed by each B-cell lymphoma is a target for immunotherapy. Vaccination with Id induces humoral and/or cellular anti-Id immune responses. However, the clinical impact of these anti-Id immune responses is unknown. We and others have previously reported that immunoglobulin G Fc receptor (FcgammaR) polymorphisms predict the clinical response of lymphoma patients to passive anti-CD20 antibody infusions. In this study, we tested whether anti-Id immune responses or FcgammaR polymorphisms associate with clinical outcome of patients who received Id vaccination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 136 patients with follicular lymphoma who had received Id vaccination. The anti-Id immune responses were measured and FcgammaRIIIa and FcgammaRIIa polymorphisms were determined and correlated with clinical outcome for these patients. RESULTS: Patients who mounted humoral immune responses had a longer progression-free survival (PFS) than those who did not (8.21 v 3.38 years; P = .018). Patients with FcgammaRIIIa 158 valine/valine (V/V) genotype also had a longer PFS than those with valine/phenylalanine (V/F) or phenylalanine/phenylalanine (F/F) genotypes (V/V, 8.21 v V/F, 3.38 years; P = .004; v F/F, 4.47 years; P = .035). Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model showed that V/V genotype and humoral immune responses were independent positive predictors for PFS. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to identify the predictive value of FcgammaR polymorphism on clinical outcome in patients who received active immunotherapy with tumor antigen vaccines. Our results imply that the antibodies induced against a tumor antigen are beneficial and that FcgammaR-bearing cells mediate an antitumor effect by killing antibody-coated tumor cells.
PURPOSE: The unique immunoglobulin idiotype (Id) expressed by each B-cell lymphoma is a target for immunotherapy. Vaccination with Id induces humoral and/or cellular anti-Id immune responses. However, the clinical impact of these anti-Id immune responses is unknown. We and others have previously reported that immunoglobulin G Fc receptor (FcgammaR) polymorphisms predict the clinical response of lymphomapatients to passive anti-CD20 antibody infusions. In this study, we tested whether anti-Id immune responses or FcgammaR polymorphisms associate with clinical outcome of patients who received Id vaccination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 136 patients with follicular lymphoma who had received Id vaccination. The anti-Id immune responses were measured and FcgammaRIIIa and FcgammaRIIa polymorphisms were determined and correlated with clinical outcome for these patients. RESULTS:Patients who mounted humoral immune responses had a longer progression-free survival (PFS) than those who did not (8.21 v 3.38 years; P = .018). Patients with FcgammaRIIIa 158 valine/valine (V/V) genotype also had a longer PFS than those with valine/phenylalanine (V/F) or phenylalanine/phenylalanine (F/F) genotypes (V/V, 8.21 v V/F, 3.38 years; P = .004; v F/F, 4.47 years; P = .035). Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model showed that V/V genotype and humoral immune responses were independent positive predictors for PFS. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to identify the predictive value of FcgammaR polymorphism on clinical outcome in patients who received active immunotherapy with tumor antigen vaccines. Our results imply that the antibodies induced against a tumor antigen are beneficial and that FcgammaR-bearing cells mediate an antitumor effect by killing antibody-coated tumor cells.
Authors: Stephen J Schuster; Sattva S Neelapu; Barry L Gause; John E Janik; Franco M Muggia; Jon P Gockerman; Jane N Winter; Christopher R Flowers; Daniel A Nikcevich; Eduardo M Sotomayor; Dean S McGaughey; Elaine S Jaffe; Elise A Chong; Craig W Reynolds; Donald A Berry; Carlos F Santos; Mihaela A Popa; Amy M McCord; Larry W Kwak Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-05-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Daniel O Persky; David Dornan; Bryan H Goldman; Rita M Braziel; Richard I Fisher; Michael Leblanc; David G Maloney; Oliver W Press; Thomas P Miller; Lisa M Rimsza Journal: Haematologica Date: 2012-01-22 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Stephen L Sazinsky; René G Ott; Nathaniel W Silver; Bruce Tidor; Jeffrey V Ravetch; K Dane Wittrup Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-12-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Suzanne N Franki; Kristopher K Steward; David J Betting; Kamran Kafi; Reiko E Yamada; John M Timmerman Journal: Blood Date: 2007-11-09 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Rodney J Taylor; Vassiliki Saloura; Ajay Jain; Olga Goloubeva; Stuart Wong; Shari Kronsberg; Madhavi Nagilla; Lorna Silpino; Jonas de Souza; Tanguy Seiwert; Everett Vokes; Victoria Villaflor; Ezra E W Cohen Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 11.151
Authors: Nicole M Okeley; Stephen C Alley; Martha E Anderson; Tamar E Boursalian; Patrick J Burke; Kim M Emmerton; Scott C Jeffrey; Kerry Klussman; Che-Leung Law; Django Sussman; Brian E Toki; Lori Westendorf; Weiping Zeng; Xinqun Zhang; Dennis R Benjamin; Peter D Senter Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 11.205