Literature DB >> 15481822

Comparative analysis of neonicotinoid binding to insect membranes: II. An unusual high affinity site for [3H]thiamethoxam in Myzus persicae and Aphis craccivora.

Henning Wellmann1, Marilyne Gomes, Connie Lee, Hartmut Kayser.   

Abstract

Neonicotinoids represent a class of insect-selective ligands of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Imidacloprid, the first commercially used neonicotinoid insecticide, has been studied on neuronal preparations from many insects to date. Here we report first intrinsic binding data of thiamethoxam, using membranes from Myzus persicae Sulzer and Aphis craccivora Koch. In both aphids, specific binding of [3H]thiamethoxam was sensitive to temperature, while the absolute level of non-specific binding was not affected. In M persicae, binding capacity (Bmax) for [3H]thiamethoxam was ca 450 fmol mg(-1) of protein at 22 degrees C and ca 700 fmol mg(-1) of protein at 2 degrees C. The negative effect of increased temperature was reversible and hence not due to some destructive process. The affinity for [3H]thiamethoxam was less affected by temperature: Kd was ca 11 nM at 2 degrees C and ca 15 nM at 22 degrees C. The membranes also lost binding sites for [3H]thiamethoxam during prolonged storage at room temperature, and upon freezing and thawing. In A craccivora, [3H]thiamethoxam was bound with a capacity of ca 1000 fmol mg(-1) protein and an affinity of ca 90 nM, as measured at 2 degrees C. Overall, the in vitro temperature sensitivity of [3H]thiamethoxam binding was in obvious contrast to the behaviour of [3H]imidacloprid studied in parallel. Moreover, the binding of [3H]thiamethoxam was inhibited by imidacloprid in a non-competitive mode, as shown with M persicae. In our view, these differences demonstrate that thiamethoxam and imidacloprid, which represent different structural sub-classes of neonicotinoids, do not share the same binding site or mode. This holds also for other neonicotinoids, as we report in a companion article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15481822     DOI: 10.1002/ps.920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pest Manag Sci        ISSN: 1526-498X            Impact factor:   4.845


  8 in total

1.  Neonicotinoid insecticides differently modulate acetycholine-induced currents on mammalian α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

Authors:  Alison Cartereau; Carine Martin; Steeve H Thany
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  The invertebrate pharmacology of insecticides acting at nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

Authors:  Andrew J Crossthwaite; Aurelien Bigot; Philippe Camblin; Jim Goodchild; Robert J Lind; Russell Slater; Peter Maienfisch
Journal:  J Pestic Sci       Date:  2017-08-20       Impact factor: 1.519

3.  Neonicotinoid-contaminated puddles of water represent a risk of intoxication for honey bees.

Authors:  Olivier Samson-Robert; Geneviève Labrie; Madeleine Chagnon; Valérie Fournier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The insecticide imidacloprid causes mortality of the freshwater amphipod Gammarus pulex by interfering with feeding behavior.

Authors:  Anna-Maija Nyman; Anita Hintermeister; Kristin Schirmer; Roman Ashauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Neonicotinoid binding, toxicity and expression of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunits in the aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum.

Authors:  Emiliane Taillebois; Abdelhamid Beloula; Sophie Quinchard; Stéphanie Jaubert-Possamai; Antoine Daguin; Denis Servent; Denis Tagu; Steeve H Thany; Hélène Tricoire-Leignel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Exposure to neonicotinoids influences the motor function of adult worker honeybees.

Authors:  Sally M Williamson; Sarah J Willis; Geraldine A Wright
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Neonicotinoids target distinct nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and neurons, leading to differential risks to bumblebees.

Authors:  Christopher Moffat; Stephen T Buckland; Andrew J Samson; Robin McArthur; Victor Chamosa Pino; Karen A Bollan; Jeffrey T-J Huang; Christopher N Connolly
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Assessing the toxicity of thiamethoxam, in natural LUFA 2.2 soil, through three generations of Folsomia candida.

Authors:  Cláudia de Lima E Silva; Justine Mariette; Rudo A Verweij; Cornelis A M van Gestel
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 2.823

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.