Literature DB >> 15481717

Cerebrospinal fluid shunt placement for pseudotumor cerebri-associated intractable headache: predictors of treatment response and an analysis of long-term outcomes.

Matthew J McGirt1, Graeme Woodworth, George Thomas, Neil Miller, Michael Williams, Daniele Rigamonti.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunts effectively reverse symptoms of pseudotumor cerebri postoperatively, but long-term outcome has not been investigated. Lumboperitoneal (LP) shunts are the mainstay of CSF shunts for pseudotumor cerebri; however, image-guided stereotaxy and neuroendoscopy now allow effective placement of a ventricular catheter without causing ventriculomegaly in these cases. To date it remains unknown if CSF shunts provide long-term relief from pseudotumor cerebri and whether a ventricular shunt is better than an LP shunt. The authors investigated these possibilities.
METHODS: The authors reviewed the records of all shunt placement procedures that were performed for intractable headache due to pseudotumor cerebri at one institution between 1973 and 2003. Using proportional hazards regression analysis, predictors of treatment failure (continued headache despite a properly functioning shunt) were assessed, and shunt revision and complication rates were compared between LP and ventricular (ventriculoperitoneal [VP] or ventriculoatrial [VAT]) shunts. Forty-two patients underwent 115 shunt placement procedures: 79 in which an LP shunt was used and 36 in which a VP or VAT shunt was used. Forty patients (95%) experienced a significant improvement in their headaches immediately after the shunt was inserted. Severe headache recurred despite a properly functioning shunt in eight (19%) and 20 (48%) patients by 12 and 36 months, respectively, after the initial shunt placement surgery. Seventeen patients without papilledema and 19 patients in whom preoperative symptoms had occurred for longer than 2 years experienced recurrent headache, making patients with papilledema or long-term symptoms fivefold (relative risk [RR] 5.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-17.8; p < 0.01) or 2.5-fold (RR 2.51, 95% CI 1.01-9.39; p = 0.05) more likely to experience headache recurrence, respectively. In contrast to VP or VAT shunts, LP shunts were associated with a 2.5-fold increased risk of shunt revision (RR 2.5, 95% CI 1.5-4.3; p < 0.001) due to a threefold increased risk of shunt obstruction (RR 3, 95% CI 1.5-5.7; p < 0.005), but there were similar risks between the two types of shunts for overdrainage (RR 2.3, 95% CI 0.8-7.9; p = 0.22), distal catheter migration (RR 2.1, 95% CI 0.3-19.3; p = 0.55), and shunt infection (RR 1.3, 95% CI 0.3-13.2; p = 0.75).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on their 30-year experience in the treatment of these patients, the authors found that CSF shunts were extremely effective in the acute treatment of pseudotumor cerebri-associated intractable headache, providing long-term relief in the majority of patients. Lack of papilledema and long-standing symptoms were risk factors for treatment failure. The use of ventricular shunts for pseudotumor cerebri was associated with a lower risk of shunt obstruction and revision than the use of LP shunts. Using ventricular shunts in patients with papilledema or symptoms lasting less than 2 years should be considered for those with pseudotumor cerebri-associated intractable headache.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15481717     DOI: 10.3171/jns.2004.101.4.0627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  49 in total

1.  An adolescent with suspected intracranial hypertension - ALL is not what it seems.

Authors:  Asgeir Store Jakola; Sasha Gulati
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Lumboperitoneal shunt for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: patients' selection and outcome.

Authors:  Waleed F El-Saadany; Ahmed Farhoud; Ihab Zidan
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Response to diet and metformin in women with idiopathic intracranial hypertension with and without concurrent polycystic ovary syndrome or hyperinsulinemia.

Authors:  Charles J Glueck; Karl C Golnik; Dawit Aregawi; Naila Goldenberg; Luann Sieve; Ping Wang
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2005-11-10

4.  Is good good enough?

Authors:  David W Roberts
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 5.  Cerebral venous sinus stenting for pseudotumor cerebri: A review.

Authors:  Sivashakthi Kanagalingam; Prem S Subramanian
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09-27

6.  An institutional review of hospital resource utilization and patient radiation exposure in shunted idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Tyler Cho; Daniel Kreatsoulas; Joel Fritz; John M McGregor; Douglas A Hardesty
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 7.  Antibiotic prophylaxis for shunt surgery of children: a systematic review.

Authors:  H Xu; F Hu; H Hu; W Sun; W Jiao; R Li; T Lei
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 8.  Update on the surgical management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Nisha Mukherjee; M Tariq Bhatti
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.081

9.  Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. A Systematic Analysis of Transverse Sinus Stenting.

Authors:  Mohamed S Teleb; Matthew E Cziep; Marc A Lazzaro; Ayman Gheith; Kaiz Asif; Bernd Remler; Osama O Zaidat
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2013

10.  Meta-Analysis of CSF Diversion Procedures and Dural Venous Sinus Stenting in the Setting of Medically Refractory Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors:  S R Satti; L Leishangthem; M I Chaudry
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.