Literature DB >> 15481671

Pediatric paradox: heterogeneity in the birth cohort.

Timothy B Gage1, Michael J Bauer, Nathan Heffner, Howard Stratton.   

Abstract

Comparisons of birth-weight-specific infant mortality indicate that low-birth-weight African American infants have lower mortality than low-birth-weight European American infants despite higher infant mortality overall-the "pediatric paradox." One explanation is heterogeneity in birth weight. Analyses of African American and European American births suggest that birth cohorts consist of two heterogeneous subpopulations. One appears to account for normal births, whereas the other may consist of compromised births. Estimates of infant mortality indicate that the compromised subpopulation has higher overall mortality but lower birth-weight-specific mortality. We attribute lower birth-weight-specific infant mortality in the compromised subpopulation to higher rates of fetal loss. Compared to European American birth cohorts, African American birth cohorts have (1) higher birth-weight-specific mortality in the normal subpopulation, (2) larger compromised subpopulations, and (3) lower birth-weight-specific mortality in the compromised subpopulation. Consequently, the pediatric paradox is attributable to greater rates of compromised pregnancies and higher fetal losses among African Americans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15481671     DOI: 10.1353/hub.2004.0045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Biol        ISSN: 0018-7143            Impact factor:   0.553


  7 in total

1.  Modeling the pediatric paradox: birth weight by gestational age.

Authors:  Timothy B Gage; Fu Fang; Howard Stratton
Journal:  Biodemography Soc Biol       Date:  2008

2.  Joint Bayesian analysis of birthweight and censored gestational age using finite mixture models.

Authors:  Scott L Schwartz; Alan E Gelfand; Marie L Miranda
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  To kill a kangaroo: understanding the decision to pursue high-risk/high-gain resources.

Authors:  James Holland Jones; Rebecca Bliege Bird; Douglas W Bird
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Thinking outside the curve, part I: modeling birthweight distribution.

Authors:  Richard Charnigo; Lorie W Chesnut; Tony Lobianco; Russell S Kirby
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Maternal education, birth weight, and infant mortality in the United States.

Authors:  Timothy B Gage; Fu Fang; Erin O'Neill; Greg Dirienzo
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2013-04

6.  Racial disparities in infant mortality: what has birth weight got to do with it and how large is it?

Authors:  Timothy B Gage; Fu Fang; Erin K O'Neill; A Gregory DiRienzo
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Maternal age and infant mortality: a test of the Wilcox-Russell hypothesis.

Authors:  Timothy B Gage; Fu Fang; Erin O'Neill; Howard Stratton
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 4.897

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.