BACKGROUND: Hyperdynamic circulation due to reduced peripheral vascular resistance and increased cardiac output, and the development of portal hypertension are the hemodynamic changes observed in patients with liver cirrhosis. Such hemodynamic abnormalities appear in patients with late stage liver cirrhosis. Therefore, hemodynamic indices, which represent hyperdynamic circulation and portal hypertension, are significant for the prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to determine the hemodynamic indices associated with the prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis. METHODS: A total of 103 patients diagnosed with liver cirrhosis between December 1999 and June 2003, with a mean follow-up period of 73 weeks, ranging from 7 to 168 weeks, were recruited. Using Child-Pugh classification, the mean arterial pressure, heart rate and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) were measured. The indices of Doppler ultrasonography, including the portal and splenic venous flows, and the resistance of the hepatic, splenic, and renal arteries were also measured using the arterial pulsatility index (PI). The prognostic values of these indices were determined by their comparison with the patient survivals. RESULTS: Significant hemodynamic indices for a bad prognosis were high HVPG (> or = 15 mmHg) and renal arterial PI (> or = 1.14)(p<0.05). A Child-Pugh score > or = 10 was important for a poor prognosis (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Severe portal hypertension (HVPG > or = 15 mmHg) and high renal arterial resistance (PI +/- 1.14) were valuable hemodynamic indices for the prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis. Therefore, it was concluded that the measurement of these hemodynamic indices, in addition to the Child-Pugh classification, is helpful in the prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis.
BACKGROUND:Hyperdynamic circulation due to reduced peripheral vascular resistance and increased cardiac output, and the development of portal hypertension are the hemodynamic changes observed in patients with liver cirrhosis. Such hemodynamic abnormalities appear in patients with late stage liver cirrhosis. Therefore, hemodynamic indices, which represent hyperdynamic circulation and portal hypertension, are significant for the prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to determine the hemodynamic indices associated with the prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis. METHODS: A total of 103 patients diagnosed with liver cirrhosis between December 1999 and June 2003, with a mean follow-up period of 73 weeks, ranging from 7 to 168 weeks, were recruited. Using Child-Pugh classification, the mean arterial pressure, heart rate and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) were measured. The indices of Doppler ultrasonography, including the portal and splenic venous flows, and the resistance of the hepatic, splenic, and renal arteries were also measured using the arterial pulsatility index (PI). The prognostic values of these indices were determined by their comparison with the patient survivals. RESULTS: Significant hemodynamic indices for a bad prognosis were high HVPG (> or = 15 mmHg) and renal arterial PI (> or = 1.14)(p<0.05). A Child-Pugh score > or = 10 was important for a poor prognosis (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Severe portal hypertension (HVPG > or = 15 mmHg) and high renal arterial resistance (PI +/- 1.14) were valuable hemodynamic indices for the prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis. Therefore, it was concluded that the measurement of these hemodynamic indices, in addition to the Child-Pugh classification, is helpful in the prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis.
Authors: R H Wiesner; S V McDiarmid; P S Kamath; E B Edwards; M Malinchoc; W K Kremers; R A Krom; W R Kim Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: A Escorsell ; J C Bandi; V Andreu; E Moitinho; J C García-Pagán; J Bosch; J Rodés Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: V Arroyo; R Planas; J Gaya; R Deulofeu; A Rimola; R M Pérez-Ayuso; F Rivera; J Rodés Journal: Eur J Clin Invest Date: 1983-06 Impact factor: 4.686
Authors: P S Kamath; R H Wiesner; M Malinchoc; W Kremers; T M Therneau; C L Kosberg; G D'Amico; E R Dickson; W R Kim Journal: Hepatology Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: B Angermayr; M Cejna; F Karnel; M Gschwantler; F Koenig; J Pidlich; H Mendel; L Pichler; M Wichlas; A Kreil; M Schmid; A Ferlitsch; E Lipinski; H Brunner; J Lammer; P Ferenci; A Gangl; M Peck-Radosavljevic Journal: Gut Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Soon Koo Baik; Dong Hun Park; Moon Young Kim; Yeun Jong Choi; Hyun Soo Kim; Dong Ki Lee; Sang Ok Kwon; Young Ju Kim; Joong Wha Park; Sei Jin Chang Journal: J Gastroenterol Date: 2003 Impact factor: 7.527
Authors: Ki Tae Suk; Moon Young Kim; Dong Hun Park; Kyu Hong Kim; Ki Won Jo; Jin Hon Hong; Jae Woo Kim; Hyun Soo Kim; Sang Ok Kwon; Soon Koo Baik Journal: Gut Liver Date: 2007-12-31 Impact factor: 4.519
Authors: Shahbaz Haider; Qurban Hussain; Sumera Tabassum; Bilal Hussain; Muhammad Rasheed Durrani; Fayyaz Ahmed Journal: Pak J Med Sci Date: 2016 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.088