| Literature DB >> 22809449 |
Chih-Hung Chen1, Li-Teh Chang, Wei-Chih Tung, Yung-Lung Chen, Chia-Lo Chang, Steve Leu, Cheuk-Kwan Sun, Tzu-Hsien Tsai, I-Ting Tsai, Hsueh-Wen Chang, Hon-Kan Yip.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The roles of circulating endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) and mononuclear cell apoptosis (MCA) in liver cirrhosis (LC) patients are unknown. Moreover, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and stromal cell-derived factor (SDF)-1α are powerful endogenous substances enhancing EPC migration into circulation. We assessed the level and function of EPCs [CD31/CD34 (E(1)), KDR/CD34 (E(2)), CXCR4/CD34 (E(3))], levels of MCA, VEGF and SDF-1α in circulation of LC patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22809449 PMCID: PMC3414826 DOI: 10.1186/1423-0127-19-66
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Sci ISSN: 1021-7770 Impact factor: 8.410
The baseline Characteristics of Study Patients and Normal Controls
| Age (yrs) | 54.8 ± 13.7 | 54.1 ± 10.5 | 0.927 |
| Male gender | 71.8 % (56) | 68.0 % (17) | 0.716 |
| EPC surface markers† | |||
| CD31/CD34 (%)‡ | 1.01 ± 0.57 | 1.37 ± 0.49 | 0.005 |
| KDR/CD34 (%)‡ | 1.08 ± 0.63 | 1.37 ± 0.65 | 0.035 |
| CXCR4/CD34 (%)‡ | 1.13 ± 0.66 | 1.54 ± 0.64 | 0.001 |
| WBC count (x 103/dl) | 8.5 ± 11.9 | 6.0 ± 1.5 | 0.575 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dl) | 10.9 ± 2.4 | 14.9 ± 1.3 | <0.0001 |
| Platelet count (x 104/dl) | 10.8 ± 6.3 | 22.4 ± 5.5 | <0.0001 |
| Creatinine (mg/dl) | 1.00 ± 0.60 | 0.91 ± 0.20 | 0.806 |
| Albumin (g/dl) | 3.0 ± 0.6 | 4.5 ± 0.3 | <0.0001 |
| AST (U/L) | 97.8 ± 107.1 | 24.6 ± 6.4 | <0.0001 |
| ALT (U/L) | 68.1 ± 123.0 | 29.3 ± 17.4 | 0.005 |
| VEGF (pg/ml) | 55.4 ± 58.0 | 49.9 ± 27.8 | 0.286 |
| SDF-1α (pg/ml) | 2256.3 ± 705.8 | 1502.4 ± 370.7 | <0.0001 |
| Early apoptosis (%) | 18.01 ± 11.66 | 6.16 ± 2.83 | <0.0001 |
| Late apoptosis (%) | 3.28 ± 3.86 | 1.19 ± 0.99 | 0.0008 |
Data expressed as mean ± SD or % (No).
ALT = alanine aminotransferase; AST = aspartate aminotransferase; EPC = endothelial progenitor cell; SDF = stromal cell-derived factor; VEGF = vascular endothelial cell growth factor; WBC = white blood cell.
* by Wilcoxon rank sum test.
† indicates EPC surface markers with double stains.
‡ The expected 0.7 % was based on our previous study [18] on EPC surface markers (CD31/CD34). The expected difference (i.e., 0.7 %) has not been reached for CD31/CD34 (or KDR/CD34, CXCR4/CD34) in Table 1.
Clinical Characteristics and Abdominal Ultrasonographic Findings of 78 Study Patients
| Age (yrs) | 59.9 ± 11.3 a | 59.6 ± 14.4 a | 50.8 ± 12.7 b | 0.030 |
| Male gender | 55.6 % (5) | 65.% (17) | 79.1 % (34) | 0.234 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 33.3 % (3) | 46.2 % (12) | 20.9 % (9) | 0.089 |
| Hypertension | 22.2 % (2) | 11.5 % (3) | 2.3 % (1) | 0.0503 |
| Current smoking | 11.1 % (1)a | 73.1 % (19)b | 48.8 % (21)b | 0.006 |
| Chronic hepatitis B | 55.6 % (5) | 38.5 % (10) | 27.9 % (12) | 0.251 |
| Chronic hepatitis C | 11.1 % (1) | 30.8 % (8) | 10 (23.3 %) | 0.513 |
| Previous EV bleeding | 22.2 % (2) | 30.8 % (8) | 46.5 % (20) | 0.295 |
| Hepatocellular carcinoma | 0 % (0) | 23.1 % (6) | 14.0 % (6) | 0.286 |
| Liver cirrhosis | 100.0 % (9) | 100.0 % (26) | 100.0 % (43) | 1.000 |
| Ascitis | 22.2 % (2) | 50.0 % (13) | 58.1 % (25) | 0.136 |
| Decompensated liver cirrhosis | 11.1 % (1)a | 38.5 % (10)b | 67.4 % (29)c | 0.002 |
| Splenomegaly | 22.2 % (2)a | 76.9 % (20)b | 67.4 % (29)b | 0.015 |
| Portal vein hypertension | 11.1 % (1)a | 30.8 % (8)b | 53.5 % (23)c | 0.028 |
Data expressed as mean ± SD or % (No).
EV, esophageal varices.
*Continuous data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test; categorical data were analyzed using Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test appropriately. Letters (a, b, C) indicate significant difference (at 0.05 level) (by Wilcoxon rank sum test with Bonferroni’s correction).
Flow Cytometric Analysis and Laboratory Findings of 78 Study Patients
| EPC surface makers (double stains) | ||||
| CD31/CD34 (%) | 1.23 ± 0.44 | 0.90 ± 0.52 | 1.03 ± 0.61 | 0.279 |
| KDR/CD34 (%) | 1.60 ± 0.51a | 0.97 ± 0.63b | 1.03 ± 0.61b | 0.013 |
| CXCR4/CD34 (%) | 1.49 ± 0.56a | 1.20 ± 0.63b | 1.00 ± 0.61b | 0.043 |
| Early apoptosis (%) | 13.5 ± 8.9 | 16.8 ± 10.8 | 19.7 ± 12.5 | 0.281 |
| Late apoptosis (%) | 1.66 ± 1.62a | 3.12 ± 4.50b | 3.67 ± 3.7b | 0.046 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dl) | 12.2 ± 2.2 | 10.1 ± 2.5 | 11.1 ± 2.2 | 0.110 |
| WBC count (x 103/dl) | 5.0 ± 2.1 | 8.7 ± 12.5 | 8.8 ± 12.3 | 0.700 |
| Platelet count (x 104/dl) | 13.6 ± 11.9 | 11.0 ± 5.5 | 10.3 ± 5.7 | 0.930 |
| Creatinine (mg/dl) | 0.84 ± 0.23 | 0.93 ± 0.34 | 1.08 ± 0.74 | 0.805 |
| Albumin (g/dl) | 2.54 ± 0.33a | 2.89 ± 0.54b | 2.87 ± 0.58b | 0.005 |
| AST (U/L) | 50.0 ± 23.6 | 114.0 ± 152.1 | 98.0 ± 80.4 | 0.097 |
| ALT (U/ml) | 45.0 ± 32.5 | 83.6 ± 195.2 | 63.5 ± 67.7 | 0.361 |
| Prothrombin time (sec) | 11.0 ± 0.7a | 13.6 ± 3.9b | 13.2 ± 2.2b | 0.006 |
| α-fetoprotein (ng/ml) | 8.3 ± 3.2 | 75.8 ± 223.5 | 1187.5 ± 6495.3 | 0.430 |
| Total bilirubin (mg/dl) | 0.8 ± 0.2a | 3.4 ± 3.2b | 4.8 ± 6.4b | 0.0002 |
| VEGF (pg/ml) | 25.0 ± 11.4a | 54.1 ± 22.4b | 62.6 ± 59.8b | 0.039 |
| SDF-1α (pg/ml) | 2030.1 ± 446.4 | 2246.1 ± 808.0 | 2309.8 ± 687.6 | 0.350 |
Data expressed as mean ± SD or % (No).
ALT = Alanine aminotransferase; AST = aspartate aminotransferase; SDF = stromal cell-derived factor; VEGF = vascular endothelial cell growth factor; WBC = white blood cell.
* Continuous data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test. Letters (a, b) indicate significant difference (at 0.05 level) (by Wilcoxon rank sum test with Bonferroni’s correction).
Figure 1Flow Cytometric and ELISA Analysis among Patients With and Without HCC and in Normal Control Subjects. A) Circulating number of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs). For CD31/CD34+ cells, * vs. †, p < 0.04. For CXCR4+/CD34+ cells, * vs. †, p < 0.03. HCC (−) = without hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 66); HCC (+) = with hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 12). B) Plasma level of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). * vs. †, p < 0.035. C) Plasma level of stromal cell-derived factor (SDF)-1α. * vs. †, p < 0.04. Symbols (*, †) indicate significant difference (at 0.05 level) (by Wilcoxon rank sum test with Bonferroni’s correction).
Multiple Stepwise Linear Regression Analysis of Independent Predictors of Increased Circulating Level of EPCs*
| Age | −0.009 | 0.059 | | | | |
| Hepatitis B | 0.340 | 0.011 | 0.380 | 0.008 | | |
| Hepatitis C | | | −0.332 | 0.035 | | |
| EV bleeding | | | 0.291 | 0.028 | | |
| Liver cirrhosis† | 0.352 | 0.087 | | | −0.708 | 0.003 |
| AST | −0.001 | 0.006 | ||||
AST = aspartate aminotransferase; EPC = endothelial progenitor cells; EV = esophageal varicis.
* Variables of Tables 2 and 3 were enrolled for analysis.
† indicated decompensated liver cirrhosis.
Figure 2In vitro function assessment of endothelial progenitor cells with transwell and matrigel tube formation assay. A to C) The transwell migratory activity of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) (100 x) was notably reduced (C) in liver cirrhosis (LC) group than in healthy control group (* vs. normal control, p < 0.0001) (n = 6). D to F). Illustration of angiogenesis using passages 2 of culturing cells (all pictures were observed under microscope of 400 x). The cluster formation (red arrows), tubular formation (black arrows) and network formation (blue dot lines) were notably higher in normal control than in LC patients (G to J). (* vs. normal control, all p values < 0.001) (n = 6) High-power field (HPF).