Hyperconvolution of the inner limiting membrane in vitreomaculopathies.

BACKGROUND: This study investigates the similarities and differences between epiretinal membranes in four clinically distinct types of vitreomaculopathy. We propose a hypothesis on the origin of the predominant cell type and its potential role in causing these conditions.
METHODS: Epiretinal membranes (ERMs) surgically removed from a prospective, consecutive series of vitrectomies for macular pucker associated with an untreated peripheral horseshoe tear (MP), cellophane maculopathy (CM), stage 4 macular hole (MH) and vitreomacular traction syndrome (VMT) were examined by light microscopy and by immunocytochemistry (ICC) using antibodies marking type IV collagen, type II collagen, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and low- and high-molecular-weight cytokeratin (MNF116). These specimens were compared with post-mortem control eyes with and without physiological posterior vitreous detachment (PVD). Light microscopy was carried out on 5-microm-thick sections cut from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks. Appropriate autoclave or enzyme pre-digestion steps were deployed to retrieve antigens for ICC. No patient had undergone previous vitreoretinal surgery or peripheral retinopexy.
RESULTS: From a series of 38 patients, (13 CM, 8 MP, 16 MH and 1 VMT) a total of 20 specimens contained sufficient tissue for histology and immunocytochemistry. All specimens contained portions of inner limiting membrane (ILM) coated by GFAP-positive cells. Specimens from patients with MP and CM exhibited hyperconvolution of the ILM, which was not found in the specimens from patients with MH or VMT or in the control eyes. Hyperconvolution was associated with increased glial cell density, GFAP staining intensity and duplication of ILM basement membrane. Three cases of ERMs from the MP group contained, in addition, cytokeratin-positive cells. In the control group; post-mortem eyes with PVDs showed patchy staining of the posterior hyaloid membrane for GFAP and type 4 collagen. Post-mortem eyes with attached gel showed weak positivity of the ILM for type 4 collagen, and a monolayer of GFAP-positive cells lined the vitreous aspect of the ILM.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that glial cells are fundamentally important in the formation of ERMs found in this group of vitreomaculopathies. The hyperconvolution and duplication of the ILM in CM and MP were striking and distinctive features and suggest a mechanism by which these membranes exert tractional forces on the retina. Post-mortem control eyes contained a similar (but more dispersed) population of GFAP-positive cells in the region of the ILM, suggesting the primary aetiology for CM and MP may originate within the ILM. ERMs from MP cases may, in addition, contain cytokeratin-positive cells, of probable RPE origin.