P F K Yong1, P C Milner, J N Payne, P A Lewis, C Jennison. 1. Avon, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire Strategic Health Authority, Jenner House, Langley Park Estate, Chippenham, Wiltshire SN15 1GG, UK. pyong@doctors.org.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To quantify the effects of socioeconomic deprivation and rurality on evidence of need for total knee joint replacement and the use of health services, after adjusting for age and sex. METHODS: A random stratified sample of 15 000 people aged > or =65 years taken from central age/sex registers for the geographical areas covered by the previous Sheffield and Wiltshire Health Authorities. A self completion validated questionnaire was then mailed directly to subjects to assess need for knee joint replacement surgery and whether general practice and hospital services were being used. Subjects were followed up for 18 months to evaluate access to surgery. RESULTS: The response rate was 78% after three mailings. In those aged 65 years and over (with and without comorbidity), the proportion with no comorbid factors and in need of knee replacement was 5.1%; the rate of need among subjects without comorbidity was 7.9%. There were inequalities in health and access to health related to age, sex, geography, and deprivation but not rurality. People who were more deprived had greater need. Older and deprived people were less likely to access health services. Only 6.4% of eligible people received knee replacement surgery after 18 months of follow up. CONCLUSIONS: There is an important unmet need in older people, with significant age, sex, geographical, and deprivation inequalities in levels of need and access to services. The use of waiting list numbers as a performance indicator is perverse for this procedure. There is urgent need to expand orthopaedic services and training.
OBJECTIVES: To quantify the effects of socioeconomic deprivation and rurality on evidence of need for total knee joint replacement and the use of health services, after adjusting for age and sex. METHODS: A random stratified sample of 15 000 people aged > or =65 years taken from central age/sex registers for the geographical areas covered by the previous Sheffield and Wiltshire Health Authorities. A self completion validated questionnaire was then mailed directly to subjects to assess need for knee joint replacement surgery and whether general practice and hospital services were being used. Subjects were followed up for 18 months to evaluate access to surgery. RESULTS: The response rate was 78% after three mailings. In those aged 65 years and over (with and without comorbidity), the proportion with no comorbid factors and in need of knee replacement was 5.1%; the rate of need among subjects without comorbidity was 7.9%. There were inequalities in health and access to health related to age, sex, geography, and deprivation but not rurality. People who were more deprived had greater need. Older and deprived people were less likely to access health services. Only 6.4% of eligible people received knee replacement surgery after 18 months of follow up. CONCLUSIONS: There is an important unmet need in older people, with significant age, sex, geographical, and deprivation inequalities in levels of need and access to services. The use of waiting list numbers as a performance indicator is perverse for this procedure. There is urgent need to expand orthopaedic services and training.
Authors: G A Hawker; J G Wright; P C Coyte; J I Williams; B Harvey; R Glazier; A Wilkins; E M Badley Journal: Med Care Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: P Jüni; P Dieppe; J Donovan; T Peters; J Eachus; N Pearson; R Greenwood; S Frankel Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Ryan P Calfee; Chirag M Shah; Colin D Canham; Ambrose H W Wong; Richard H Gelberman; Charles A Goldfarb Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2012-12-05 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Rachael Gooberman-Hill; Anna Sansom; Caroline M Sanders; Paul A Dieppe; Jeremy Horwood; Ian D Learmonth; Susan Williams; Jenny L Donovan Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2010-09-17 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: J Christiaan Keurentjes; David Blane; Melanie Bartley; Johan J B Keurentjes; Marta Fiocco; Rob G Nelissen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-03-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Elizabeth M Badley; Mayilee Canizares; Crystal MacKay; Nizar N Mahomed; Aileen M Davis Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-06-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sharon Lee Brennan; Tyman Stanford; Anita E Wluka; Richard S Page; Stephen E Graves; Mark A Kotowicz; Geoffrey C Nicholson; Julie A Pasco Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2012-10-03 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Rubén E Mújica Mota; Rosanna Tarricone; Oriana Ciani; John F P Bridges; Mike Drummond Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2012-07-30 Impact factor: 2.655