Literature DB >> 15479359

Dwell time and functional failure in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes: a prospective randomized-controlled comparison between silicon polymer and polyurethane percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes.

J Blacka1, J Donoghue, M Sutherland, I Martincich, S Mitten-Lewis, P Morris, G Meredith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Silicone percutaneous endoscopic gastros-tomy (PEG) tubes are associated with more short-term complications and possibly fail sooner than those made of polyurethane. Understanding the deterioration and long-term complications leading to tube failure has important clinical and cost implications. AIM: To compare dwell time and patterns of failure ofsilicone polymer and polyurethane PEG tubes.
METHODS: Participants randomized to receive a siliconepolymer (n = 76) or polyurethane (n = 62) PEG werevisited monthly for 540 days, until death or tube removal. Tube and exit site characteristics and reasons for removal were recorded.
RESULTS: Tube failure occurred in 25% of silicone PEGs and 12.9% of polyurethane PEGs. Mean tube survival for silicone PEGs was 377.2 days (CI: 326-428) and for polyurethane 436.8 days (CI: 383-490; P = 0.13). A greater proportion of silicone PEGs developed intralumenal colonization and altered tube integrity than polyurethane (P < 0.001). Silicone PEGs blocked more frequently (P < 0.005) and were removed because of irreversible blockage more often than polyurethane PEGs (P < 0.05). Silicone PEGs with reversible blockage and tube integrity changes had a significantly greater probability of failure than silicone tubes without these changes (P < 0.005 and P < 0.05, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Observations over time indicate that sili-cone PEGs are more susceptible than polyurethane PEGs to tube deterioration, resulting in substantially increased management demands to sustain patients' feeding and medication schedules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15479359     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02191.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0269-2813            Impact factor:   8.171


  10 in total

1.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube replacement: A simple procedure?

Authors:  Varut Lohsiriwat
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-01-16

2.  Percutaneous laparoscopic assisted gastrostomy (PLAG)--a new technique for cases of pharyngoesophageal obstruction.

Authors:  Ulrich Bolder; Marcus N Scherer; Thorsten Schmidt; Matthias Hornung; Hans-Jürgen Schlitt; Peter Vogel
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  A review of alternatives to di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate-containing medical devices in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  E D S Van Vliet; E M Reitano; J S Chhabra; G P Bergen; R M Whyatt
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 4.  Gastrostomy tubes: Fundamentals, periprocedural considerations, and best practices.

Authors:  Anand Rajan; Peerapol Wangrattanapranee; Jonathan Kessler; Trilokesh Dey Kidambi; James H Tabibian
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-04-27

Review 5.  Complications of and controversies associated with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: report of a case and literature review.

Authors:  Jonathan Z Potack; Sita Chokhavatia
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2008-06-17

6.  Triggerable tough hydrogels for gastric resident dosage forms.

Authors:  Jinyao Liu; Yan Pang; Shiyi Zhang; Cody Cleveland; Xiaolei Yin; Lucas Booth; Jiaqi Lin; Young-Ah Lucy Lee; Hormoz Mazdiyasni; Sarah Saxton; Ameya R Kirtane; Thomas von Erlach; Jaimie Rogner; Robert Langer; Giovanni Traverso
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Gastrostomy Tube Placement by Radiological Methods for Older Patients Requiring Enteral Nutrition: Not to be Forgotten.

Authors:  Vered Hermush; Yitshal Berner; Yael Katz; Yanina Kunin; Irena Krasniansky; Yael Schwartz; Debbie Mimran Nahon; Ana Elizariev; Gad Mendelson
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-09-26

8.  How often should percutaneous gastrostomy feeding tubes be replaced? A single-institute retrospective study.

Authors:  Byung Hyo Cha; Min Jung Park; Joo Yeong Baeg; Sunpyo Lee; Eui Yong Jeon; Wafaa Salem Obaid Alsalami; Osama Mohamed Ibrahim Idris; Young Joon Ahn
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-04

9.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): retrospective analysis of a 7-year clinical experience.

Authors:  Nenad Vanis; Aida Saray; Srdjan Gornjakovic; Rusmir Mesihovic
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2012-12

10.  Usage characteristics and adverse event rates ​of the direct puncture and pull techniques for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with malignant tumors of the upper aerodigestive tract.

Authors:  Niels Teich; Lars Selig; Susanne Liese; Franziska Schiefke; Alexander Hemprich; Joachim Mössner; Ingolf Schiefke
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-01-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.