Literature DB >> 15478440

An acoustic description of the vowels of Northern and Southern Standard Dutch.

Patti Adank1, Roeland van Hout, Roel Smits.   

Abstract

A database is presented of measurements of the fundamental frequency, the frequencies of the first three formants, and the duration of the 15 vowels of Standard Dutch as spoken in the Netherlands (Northern Standard Dutch) and in Belgium (Southern Standard Dutch). The speech material consisted of read monosyllabic utterances in a neutral consonantal context (i.e., /sVs/). Recordings were made for 20 female talkers and 20 male talkers, who were stratified for the factors age, gender, and region. Of the 40 talkers, 20 spoke Northern Standard Dutch and 20 spoke Southern Standard Dutch. The results indicated that the nine monophthongal Dutch vowels /a [see symbol in text] epsilon i I [see symbol in text] u y Y/ can be separated fairly well given their steady-state characteristics, while the long mid vowels /e o ø/ and three diphthongal vowels /epsilon I [see symbol in text]u oey/ also require information about their dynamic characteristics. The analysis of the formant values indicated that Northern Standard Dutch and Southern Standard Dutch differ little in the formant frequencies at steady-state for the nine monophthongal vowels. Larger differences between these two language varieties were found for the dynamic specifications of the three long mid vowels, and, to a lesser extent, of the three diphthongal vowels.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15478440     DOI: 10.1121/1.1779271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  26 in total

1.  Whistling shares a common tongue with speech: bioacoustics from real-time MRI of the human vocal tract.

Authors:  Michel Belyk; Benjamin G Schultz; Joao Correia; Deryk S Beal; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Cross-dialectal variation in formant dynamics of American English vowels.

Authors:  Robert Allen Fox; Ewa Jacewicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Dutch and English listeners' interpretation of vowel duration.

Authors:  Suzanne V H van der Feest; Daniel Swingley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of Word Position on the Acoustic Realization of Vietnamese Final Consonants.

Authors:  Thi Thuy Hien Tran; Nathalie Vallée; Lionel Granjon
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 1.759

5.  A cross-linguistic examination of toddlers' interpretation of vowel duration.

Authors:  Daniel Swingley; Suzanne Van der Feest
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2019-01-13

6.  Learning phonology from surface distributions, considering Dutch and English vowel duration.

Authors:  Daniel Swingley
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2019-02-14

7.  Native language governs interpretation of salient speech sound differences at 18 months.

Authors:  Christiane Dietrich; Daniel Swingley; Janet F Werker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Constraints on the processes responsible for the extrinsic normalization of vowels.

Authors:  Matthias J Sjerps; Holger Mitterer; James M McQueen
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Tolerance for inconsistency in foreign-accented speech.

Authors:  Marijt J Witteman; Andrea Weber; James M McQueen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04

10.  How the human brain recognizes speech in the context of changing speakers.

Authors:  Katharina von Kriegstein; David R R Smith; Roy D Patterson; Stefan J Kiebel; Timothy D Griffiths
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.