Literature DB >> 15477723

Chemotherapy for gastro-enteropancreatic endocrine tumours.

Dermot O'Toole1, Olivia Hentic, Olivier Corcos, Philippe Ruszniewski.   

Abstract

Despite similar histological and morphological aspects, gastro-enteropancreatic (GEP) endocrine tumours represent a heterogeneous group of tumours with varying clinical expression depending on tumour type (functional or not), origin and extension, but also on histological differentiation and proliferative capacity. The natural history of well-differentiated tumours is often favourable without treatment and GEP endocrine tumours may remain indolent for many years. Chemotherapy may however be indicated in the presence of symptomatic non-progressive disease (progression evaluated over 3-6 months). In contrast, poorly differentiated GEP endocrine tumours are frequently aggressive and early treatment is required. Accurate staging is mandatory and where surgery is possible (even in the event of limited metastatic disease), this option should be re-evaluated in a multidisciplinary approach. Approximately 2/3 of malignant GEP tumours are metastatic at discovery and surgery is possible in a minority of patients; therefore, chemotherapy, with/without other strategies (e.g. local ablation), is frequently indicated in patients with symptomatic, bulky or progressive disease. For well-differentiated pancreatic tumours, the reference association is Adriamycin with streptozotocin yielding objective responses (OR) in 40-60% of patients. Prolonged treatment is limited due to potential cardiotoxicity of Adriamycin and standard 2nd-line regimens are not of proven efficacy; thus, other treatment modalities are usually additionally required (e.g. chemo-embolisation). A significant OR may render a small number of patients secondarily amenable to surgery. Published series evaluating chemotherapy for midgut endocrine tumours are outdated and disappointing. Objective response rates with combined associations (including either 5-fluorouracil and/or streptozotocin) rarely exceed 20% and where possible, chemo-embolisation for hepatic metastases combined with somatostatin analogues (+/- interferon) should be preferred. Poorly differentiated GEP tumours are generally aggressive tumours with metastases at diagnosis and tend to progress rapidly. Surgery is rarely possible and ineffective even in locally advanced disease due to a high risk of recurrence. Chemotherapy, using cisplatin and etoposide, is the reference treatment and frequently yields OR rates >50%. However, despite being chemosensitive, disease control is limited (8-10 months). Overall, advances in therapeutic chemotherapeutic options are required in the management of all types of advanced GEP endocrine tumours and evaluation of new drugs (e.g. irinotecan) and combination strategies (chemotherapy with local ablative therapies) are required in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15477723     DOI: 10.1159/000080747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroendocrinology        ISSN: 0028-3835            Impact factor:   4.914


  12 in total

1.  Recurrent small bowel obstruction in an elderly woman.

Authors:  T S Chandrasekar; M Murugesh; M Murthy; B S Ramakrishna
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-03

2.  Defining predictors for long progression-free survival after radioembolisation of hepatic metastases of neuroendocrine origin.

Authors:  Wieland H Sommer; Felix Ceelen; Xabier García-Albéniz; Philipp M Paprottka; Christoph J Auernhammer; Marco Armbruster; Konstantin Nikolaou; Alexander R Haug; Maximilian F Reiser; Daniel Theisen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Radioembolization with yttrium-90 resin microspheres for neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases.

Authors:  Ahmet Peker; Okan Çiçek; Çiğdem Soydal; Nuriye Özlem Küçük; Sadık Bilgiç
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

4.  Comparison of [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotate and [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotide: which peptide is preferable for PRRT?

Authors:  J P Esser; E P Krenning; J J M Teunissen; P P M Kooij; A L H van Gameren; W H Bakker; D J Kwekkeboom
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Intra-arterial liver-directed therapies for neuroendocrine hepatic metastases.

Authors:  Sanjay Gupta
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 6.  Medical treatment of gastrinomas.

Authors:  Christoph J Auernhammer; Burkhard Göke
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 7.  Emerging approaches in the management of patients with neuroendocrine liver metastasis: role of liver-directed and systemic therapies.

Authors:  Skye C Mayo; Joseph M Herman; David Cosgrove; Nik Bhagat; Ihab Kamel; Jean-Francois H Geschwind; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 8.  Peptide receptor therapies in neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  L Bodei; D Ferone; C M Grana; M Cremonesi; A Signore; R A Dierckx; G Paganelli
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 9.  Peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy for endocrine tumors.

Authors:  Martijn van Essen; Eric P Krenning; Boen L R Kam; Marion de Jong; Roelf Valkema; Dik J Kwekkeboom
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 43.330

10.  Surgical Feasibility, Determinants, and Overall Efficacy of Neoadjuvant 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT for Locally Advanced Unresectable Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Rahul V Parghane; Manish Bhandare; Vikram Chaudhari; Vikas Ostwal; Anant Ramaswamy; Sanjay Talole; Shailesh V Shrikhande; Sandip Basu
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.