OBJECTIVES: To define predictive parameters of long progression-free survival (PFS) in patients undergoing radioembolisation of neuroendocrine liver metastases. METHODS: The following clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters of 45 radioembolised patients (median age, 62 years; range, 43-75) were reviewed: age, gender, levels of chromogranin A and neuron-specific enolase (NSE), primary tumour site, Ki-67 proliferation index, hepatic tumour load, number of metastases, signal intensity characteristics, vascularisation, haemorrhagic and necrotic transformation and fluid-fluid levels. PFS was assessed according to RECIST 1.0. Statistical analysis included univariate Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier and multivariate regression. RESULTS: Median PFS was 727 days (95 % CI, 378-964). In the univariate regression analysis, hypovascular metastases progressed earlier (111 vs 727 days; P < 0.05). A Ki-67 ≤2 % was associated with a longer PFS than a Ki-67 of 3-20 % or >20 % (911 vs 727 vs 210 days, respectively; P < 0.05). Low NSE predicted longer PFS (911 vs 378 days; P < 0.05). In the adjusted multivariate analysis, vascularisation (hypervascularisation vs. no hypervascularisation; P = 0.0009) and NSE level (low vs high; P = 0.0119) had the strongest influence on PFS. CONCLUSION: Response to radioembolisation in patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases can be predicted by the metastatic vascularisation pattern, the NSE level and the Ki-67. KEY POINTS: • Radioembolisation is an effective treatment in hepatic metastases of neuroendocrine origin. • Pre-therapeutic vascularisation patterns of metastases on MRI can predict long progression-free survival. • Assessment of pre-therapeutic markers provides better therapy planning.
OBJECTIVES: To define predictive parameters of long progression-free survival (PFS) in patients undergoing radioembolisation of neuroendocrine liver metastases. METHODS: The following clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters of 45 radioembolised patients (median age, 62 years; range, 43-75) were reviewed: age, gender, levels of chromogranin A and neuron-specific enolase (NSE), primary tumour site, Ki-67 proliferation index, hepatic tumour load, number of metastases, signal intensity characteristics, vascularisation, haemorrhagic and necrotic transformation and fluid-fluid levels. PFS was assessed according to RECIST 1.0. Statistical analysis included univariate Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier and multivariate regression. RESULTS: Median PFS was 727 days (95 % CI, 378-964). In the univariate regression analysis, hypovascular metastases progressed earlier (111 vs 727 days; P < 0.05). A Ki-67 ≤2 % was associated with a longer PFS than a Ki-67 of 3-20 % or >20 % (911 vs 727 vs 210 days, respectively; P < 0.05). Low NSE predicted longer PFS (911 vs 378 days; P < 0.05). In the adjusted multivariate analysis, vascularisation (hypervascularisation vs. no hypervascularisation; P = 0.0009) and NSE level (low vs high; P = 0.0119) had the strongest influence on PFS. CONCLUSION: Response to radioembolisation in patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases can be predicted by the metastatic vascularisation pattern, the NSE level and the Ki-67. KEY POINTS: • Radioembolisation is an effective treatment in hepatic metastases of neuroendocrine origin. • Pre-therapeutic vascularisation patterns of metastases on MRI can predict long progression-free survival. • Assessment of pre-therapeutic markers provides better therapy planning.
Authors: Simon Schimmack; Bernhard Svejda; Benjamin Lawrence; Mark Kidd; Irvin M Modlin Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2011-01-28 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Marianne Pavel; Eric Baudin; Anne Couvelard; Eric Krenning; Kjell Öberg; Thomas Steinmüller; Martin Anlauf; Bertram Wiedenmann; Ramon Salazar Journal: Neuroendocrinology Date: 2012-02-15 Impact factor: 4.914
Authors: Philipp M Paprottka; Ralf-T Hoffmann; Alexander Haug; Wieland H Sommer; Franziska Raessler; Christoph G Trumm; Gerwin P Schmidt; Nima Ashoori; Maximilian F Reiser; Tobias F Jakobs Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2011-08-17 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Eric Raymond; Laetitia Dahan; Jean-Luc Raoul; Yung-Jue Bang; Ivan Borbath; Catherine Lombard-Bohas; Juan Valle; Peter Metrakos; Denis Smith; Aaron Vinik; Jen-Shi Chen; Dieter Hörsch; Pascal Hammel; Bertram Wiedenmann; Eric Van Cutsem; Shem Patyna; Dongrui Ray Lu; Carolyn Blanckmeister; Richard Chao; Philippe Ruszniewski Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-02-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bassel Atassi; Affaan K Bangash; Ammar Bahrani; Giuseppi Pizzi; Robert J Lewandowski; Robert K Ryu; Kent T Sato; Vanessa L Gates; Mary F Mulcahy; Laura Kulik; Frank Miller; Vahid Yaghmai; Ravi Murthy; Andrew Larson; Reed A Omary; Riad Salem Journal: Radiographics Date: 2008 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: N C Turner; S J Strauss; D Sarker; R Gillmore; A Kirkwood; A Hackshaw; A Papadopoulou; J Bell; I Kayani; C Toumpanakis; F Grillo; A Mayer; D Hochhauser; R H Begent; M E Caplin; T Meyer Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-03-16 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Anja Rinke; Hans-Helge Müller; Carmen Schade-Brittinger; Klaus-Jochen Klose; Peter Barth; Matthias Wied; Christina Mayer; Behnaz Aminossadati; Ulrich-Frank Pape; Michael Bläker; Jan Harder; Christian Arnold; Thomas Gress; Rudolf Arnold Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-08-24 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Andrew S Kennedy; William A Dezarn; Patrick McNeillie; Doug Coldwell; Charles Nutting; Dennis Carter; Ravi Murthy; Steven Rose; Richard R P Warner; David Liu; Holger Palmedo; Carroll Overton; Bonita Jones; Riad Salem Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: K J Paprottka; F Schoeppe; M Ingrisch; J Rübenthaler; N N Sommer; E De Toni; H Ilhan; M Zacherl; A Todica; P M Paprottka Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Matthias F Froelich; Volker Heinemann; Wieland H Sommer; Julian W Holch; Franziska Schoeppe; Nina Hesse; Alena B Baumann; Wolfgang G Kunz; Maximilian F Reiser; Jens Ricke; Melvin D'Anastasi; Sebastian Stintzing; Dominik P Modest; Philipp M Kazmierczak; Felix O Hofmann Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 5.315