OBJECTIVE: To report epithelial perilenticular opacity as a new complication of intracorneal inlay implantation for the correction of hyperopia. DESIGN: Prospective observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven eyes of 7 patients underwent intracorneal inlay implantation for the correction of hyperopia. METHODS: Intracorneal inlays were implanted onto the stromal bed by using a microkeratome cut to create an inferior hinged corneal flap. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative complication occurrence of intracorneal perilenticular opacity, microbiological laboratory analysis, histopathological analysis, and confocal microscopy study. RESULTS: Of 11 implanted eyes, 5 showed diffuse perilenticular opacity of varying intensity that was unresponsive to steroid use following intracorneal inlay implantation. All patients had moderate to severe loss of best-corrected visual acuity. The inlays showed deposits at the edge and on the surface. Confocal microscopy in all eyes produced images compatible with the confocal morphologic features of epithelial cells. Explantation of inlays was performed in 5 eyes. The histopathologic study showed the presence of epithelial cells, and microbiological analysis and cultures were negative for bacteria, fungi, and mycobacteria. CONCLUSION: Epithelial perilenticular opacity is a new and serious complication in patients with intracorneal inlay implantation for the correction of hyperopia.
OBJECTIVE: To report epithelial perilenticular opacity as a new complication of intracorneal inlay implantation for the correction of hyperopia. DESIGN: Prospective observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven eyes of 7 patients underwent intracorneal inlay implantation for the correction of hyperopia. METHODS: Intracorneal inlays were implanted onto the stromal bed by using a microkeratome cut to create an inferior hinged corneal flap. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative complication occurrence of intracorneal perilenticular opacity, microbiological laboratory analysis, histopathological analysis, and confocal microscopy study. RESULTS: Of 11 implanted eyes, 5 showed diffuse perilenticular opacity of varying intensity that was unresponsive to steroid use following intracorneal inlay implantation. All patients had moderate to severe loss of best-corrected visual acuity. The inlays showed deposits at the edge and on the surface. Confocal microscopy in all eyes produced images compatible with the confocal morphologic features of epithelial cells. Explantation of inlays was performed in 5 eyes. The histopathologic study showed the presence of epithelial cells, and microbiological analysis and cultures were negative for bacteria, fungi, and mycobacteria. CONCLUSION: Epithelial perilenticular opacity is a new and serious complication in patients with intracorneal inlay implantation for the correction of hyperopia.