Literature DB >> 15477367

Microsurgical varicocelectomy for infertile couples with advanced female age: natural history in the era of ART.

Jeanne H O'Brien1, Ben Bowles, Khaled M Kamal, Keith Jarvi, Armand Zini.   

Abstract

Varicocele represents the most common cause of male infertility, and most reports indicate that varicocelectomy has a beneficial effect on male fertility and pregnancy outcome. Assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) are an alternative to varicocelectomy for the management of couples with a varicocele. The age of the female partner is important in the decision-making process; however, the true influence of female age on pregnancy outcome following varicocelectomy or ART in these couples is unknown. We evaluated the outcomes of 2 cohorts of infertile men with a varicocele and a female partner 35 years of age or older; one group selected varicocelectomy and the other a nonsurgical approach. We reviewed a group of consecutive infertile men who underwent microsurgical varicocelectomy and whose partners are 35 years of age or older (n = 110). We also reviewed a consecutive group of men with varicoceles who elected not to have surgery and whose partners are 35 years of age or older (n = 94). The outcome measures included changes in semen parameters, pregnancy rates (assisted and unassisted), and use of ART. The surgical and nonsurgical groups had comparable semen parameters and female ages. Mean sperm concentration and motility increased significantly after varicocelectomy (P < .05). At a mean of 30 months follow-up, 35% of couples in the surgical group achieved a spontaneous pregnancy and an additional 6% achieved a pregnancy via ART (20% of this group attempted ART). In the nonsurgical group, 25% achieved a spontaneous pregnancy and an additional 16% achieved a pregnancy with ART (40% of this group attempted ART). This study on the natural history of infertile men with varicocele and advanced female age suggests that the surgical and nonsurgical approaches offer comparable pregnancy outcome (combined assisted and unassisted pregnancy rates are about 40%). Overall, these data suggest that varicocelectomy is an acceptable option for couples with advanced female age, but other female factors must be considered in the decision-making process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15477367     DOI: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.2004.tb03165.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Androl        ISSN: 0196-3635


  9 in total

Review 1.  The great debate: varicocele treatment and impact on fertility.

Authors:  Matthew A Will; Jason Swain; Mikkel Fode; Jens Sonksen; Gregory M Christman; Dana Ohl
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Predictors for spontaneous pregnancy after microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jian-Wei Zhang; Quan-Quan Xu; You-Lin Kuang; Yan Wang; Feng Xu; Yu-Dong Tian
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Varicocele and testicular function.

Authors:  Alexander W Pastuszak; Run Wang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  The Effect of Age on Semen Quality and Spontaneous Pregnancy Rates in Patients who Treated with Microsurgical Inguinal Varicocelectomy.

Authors:  Fatih Fırat; Fikret Erdemir
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-04-20

Review 5.  The role of varicocele repair in the new era of assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Marcello Cocuzza; Mariana Amora Cocuzza; Frances Monette Papa Bragais; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.365

6.  [Impact of varicocele on testicular volume and sperm parameters].

Authors:  Mohamed Hicham Benazzouz; Younes Essatara; Hachem El Sayegh; Ali Iken; Lounis Benslimane; Yassine Nouini
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2014-11-28

Review 7.  Cost-effectiveness of varicocele surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Kelly A Chiles; Peter N Schlegel
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 8.  Prognostic factors for a favorable outcome after varicocele repair in adolescents and adults.

Authors:  Mary K Samplaski; Keith A Jarvi
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Comparison of outcomes in intrauterine insemination, in vitro fertilisation and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in men with and without varicocele.

Authors:  Xiao Li; Xiaoli Yang; Xianlong Wang; Li Wang; Jiaolong Liu; Feifei Cai; Yaqing Wang; Shaoming Lu
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.738

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.