Literature DB >> 15477002

Assessing inpatients' satisfaction with hospital care: should we prefer evaluation or satisfaction ratings?

A A Jolijn Hendriks1, Marjon R Vrielink, Saskia Q van Es, Hanneke J C J M De Haes, Ellen M A Smets.   

Abstract

Inpatients' satisfaction with hospital care is often assessed by questionnaire. From a psychometrical standpoint, this method has drawbacks, however. We further investigated which item response format would maximise desirable outcomes regarding characteristics of the sample obtained (response rate and representativeness) and psychometric properties of the instrument (e.g. missing items responses, variance, validity) as an initial study into this question was indecisive. Subjects were 1184 discharged inpatients, of which 728 patients (62%) responded. They filled out a 55-item satisfaction questionnaire, addressing 12 aspects of care, using either a 10-point Evaluation scale ranging from "very poor" to "excellent" (E10) or a 5-point Satisfaction scale ranging from "dissatisfied" to "very satisfied" (S5). Both E10 and S5 showed good psychometric properties, but S5 yielded a better score distribution. Other results also favoured S5, but differences were small. In conclusion, different response formats do not yield widely different results. Thus, in choosing between them, convenience could be a decisive factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15477002     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  8 in total

1.  How does your doctor talk with you? Preliminary validation of a brief patient self-report questionnaire on the quality of physician-patient interaction.

Authors:  Christiane Bieber; Knut G Müller; Jennifer Nicolai; Mechthild Hartmann; Wolfgang Eich
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2010-06

2.  Development and preliminary validation of a questionnaire to measure satisfaction with home care in Greece: an exploratory factor analysis of polychoric correlations.

Authors:  Vassilis H Aletras; Arsenis Kostarelis; Maria Tsitouridou; Dimitris Niakas; Anna Nicolaou
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  The Universal Patient Centeredness Questionnaire: scaling approaches to reduce positive skew.

Authors:  Oyvind Bjertnaes; Hilde Hestad Iversen; Andrew M Garratt
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.711

4.  Comparison of two rating scales with the orofacial esthetic scale and practical recommendations for its application.

Authors:  Swaha Pattanaik; Mike T John; Seungwon Chung; San Keller
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 3.077

5.  Relationship between inpatient satisfaction and the quality of surgery.

Authors:  Rongyu Shang; Duan Wang; Huifen Cai; Jiafei Chen; Lin Lv; Chunji Huang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-05

6.  The importance of rating scales in measuring patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Jyoti Khadka; Vijaya K Gothwal; Colm McAlinden; Ecosse L Lamoureux; Konrad Pesudovs
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  Designing questionnaires: healthcare survey to compare two different response scales.

Authors:  Salome Dell-Kuster; Esteban Sanjuan; Atanas Todorov; Heidemarie Weber; Michael Heberer; Rachel Rosenthal
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  A core competency model for Chinese baccalaureate nursing graduates: a descriptive correlational study in Beijing.

Authors:  Fang Yu Yang; Rong Rong Zhao; Yi Si Liu; Ying Wu; Ning Ning Jin; Rui Ying Li; Shu Ping Shi; Yue Ying Shao; Ming Guo; David Arthur; Malcolm Elliott
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.442

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.