Literature DB >> 15476811

Charge translocation during cosubstrate binding in the Na+/proline transporter of E.coli.

A Zhou1, A Wozniak, K Meyer-Lipp, M Nietschke, H Jung, K Fendler.   

Abstract

Charge translocation associated with the activity of the Na(+)/proline cotransporter PutP of Escherichia coli was analyzed for the first time. Using a rapid solution exchange technique combined with a solid-supported membrane (SSM), it was demonstrated that Na(+)and/or proline individually or together induce a displacement of charge. This was assigned to an electrogenic Na(+)and/or proline binding process at the cytoplasmic face of the enzyme with a rate constant of k>50s(-1) which preceeds the rate-limiting step. Based on the kinetic analysis of our electrical signals, the following characteristics are proposed for substrate binding in PutP. (1) Substrate binding is electrogenic not only for Na(+), but also for the uncharged cosubstrate proline. The charge displacement associated with the binding of both substrates is of comparable size and independent of the presence of the respective cosubstrate. (2) Both substrates can bind individually to the transporter. Under physiological conditions, an ordered binding mechanism prevails, while at sufficiently high concentrations, each substrate can bind in the absence of the other. (3) Both substrate binding sites interact cooperatively with each other by increasing the affinity and/or the speed of binding of the respective cosubstrate. (4) Proline binding proceeds in a two-step process: low affinity (approximately 1mM) electroneutral substrate binding followed by a nearly irreversible electrogenic conformational transition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15476811     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  9 in total

1.  Functional reconstitution of SdcS, a Na+-coupled dicarboxylate carrier protein from Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Jason A Hall; Ana M Pajor
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 2.  Secondary transport of amino acids in prokaryotes.

Authors:  H Jung; T Pirch; D Hilger
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 1.843

3.  Measuring ion channels on solid supported membranes.

Authors:  Patrick Schulz; Benjamin Dueck; Alexandre Mourot; Lina Hatahet; Klaus Fendler
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Direct observation of electrogenic NH4(+) transport in ammonium transport (Amt) proteins.

Authors:  Tobias Wacker; Juan J Garcia-Celma; Philipp Lewe; Susana L A Andrade
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Functional Characterization of SLC Transporters Using Solid Supported Membranes.

Authors:  Andre Bazzone; Maria Barthmes
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2020

6.  Proline availability regulates proline-4-hydroxylase synthesis and substrate uptake in proline-hydroxylating recombinant Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Francesco Falcioni; Lars M Blank; Oliver Frick; Andreas Karau; Bruno Bühler; Andreas Schmid
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Prokaryotic Solute/Sodium Symporters: Versatile Functions and Mechanisms of a Transporter Family.

Authors:  Tania Henriquez; Larissa Wirtz; Dan Su; Heinrich Jung
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Introduction to solid supported membrane based electrophysiology.

Authors:  Andre Bazzone; Wagner Steuer Costa; Markus Braner; Octavian Călinescu; Lina Hatahet; Klaus Fendler
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 9.  Label-Free Bioelectrochemical Methods for Evaluation of Anticancer Drug Effects at a Molecular Level.

Authors:  Francesco Tadini-Buoninsegni; Ilaria Palchetti
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 3.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.